PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2897 / 115th Congress

To authorize the Mayor of the District of Columbia and the Director of the National Park Service to enter into cooperative management agreements for the operation, maintenance, and management of units of the National Park System in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-315.

Official summary

Version 29 · Reported to House without amendment, Part II · Dec 5, 2017

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the first House reported version is repeated here.)

(Sec. 1) This bill authorizes the District of Columbia and the National Park Service (NPS) to enter into cooperative management agreements for the operation, maintenance, and management of National Park System units in DC, including the design and construction of improvements.

Such agreements may include terms and conditions relating to the allocation of responsibility between DC and the NPS and the payment of funds by the NPS and DC in support of such agreement.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] · D–DC

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-315.

  2. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-315.

  3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 542.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.

  5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.

  6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  7. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 115-504.

  8. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  9. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  10. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H394)

  11. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H394)

  12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2897.

  13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H394-395)

  14. Mr. Gianforte moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  15. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 323.

  16. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-436, Part II.

  17. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-436, Part II.

  18. Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 115-436, Part I.

  19. Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 115-436, Part I.

  20. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  21. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged.

  22. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  23. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  24. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  25. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

  26. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  27. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  28. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  29. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E814-815)

  30. Introduced in House

  31. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2897 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2897 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2897 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2897 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources