PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2875 / 115th Congress

National Flood Insurance Program Administrative Reform Act of 2017

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 166.

Official summary

Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · Jul 18, 2017

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.)

National Flood Insurance Program Administrative Reform Act of 2017

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to require the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to make additional coverage of up to $30,000 available under its existing Increased Cost of Compliance program, with optional coverage of up to $60,000. Currently, FEMA may make available coverage to insure the cost of mitigating future flood damage to a structure insured by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that has been substantially or repetitively damaged by floods. The bill allows FEMA to require the property owner maintain continuous flood insurance coverage as a condition of providing cost of compliance coverage.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

(Sec. 3) FEMA is directed to establish a pilot program for "Write Your Own" companies (companies that write and service federal standard flood insurance policies in their own name) to investigate preexisting structural conditions in properties that may result in a denial of a claim in the event of a flood loss under NFIP.

(Sec. 4) Fraud and false statements in connection with a flood insurance claim under NFIP are subject to civil enforcement, penalties, and suspension from the program. The bill directs FEMA to refer evidence of this activity to the Department of Justice.

(Sec. 5) FEMA is directed to revise the appeals process for policyholders seeking review of a flood insurance claim denial by their insurer. A decision shall be provided to the policyholder.

(Sec. 6) Claims under NFIP must be decided no later than 90 days after the claim is made. In extraordinary cases, the deadline may be extended by an additional 15 days.

(Sec. 7) This bill establishes FEMA's authority to oversee litigation conducted by Write Your Own companies regarding NFIP contracts, including expenses and litigation strategy. FEMA is authorized to substitute itself for a Write Your Own company in litigation.

(Sec. 8) FEMA may not hire in connection with NFIP any disbarred or suspended attorney.

(Sec. 9) FEMA must establish penalties for Write Your Own companies that knowingly underpay NFIP claims.

(Sec. 10) FEMA may rely upon technical assistance reports when adjusting claims made under NFIP only if the reports are final and meet applicable professional standards. Technical assistance reports must be made available to policyholders upon request when used in claim determinations.

(Sec. 11) Every policy issued under NFIP must include documents describing the type of loss covered, a summary of the costs of the policy, and an explanation of the policy's parameters.

(Sec. 12) FEMA is authorized to credit reserve funds to the National Flood Insurance Fund.

(Sec. 13) FEMA is directed to ensure sufficient staff for the Flood Insurance Advocate.

(Sec. 14) The bill establishes a Federal Flood Insurance Advisory Committee.

(Sec. 15) The bill directs federal lending regulation entities and FEMA to update interagency guidance regarding flood insurance.

(Sec. 16) The bill directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to report on claims adjustment practices under NFIP.

(Sec. 17) The bill directs GAO to report on NFIP coverage of earth movement and subsidence caused by flooding.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7] · D–NY

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 166.

  2. Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 115-233.

  3. Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 115-233.

  4. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 58 - 0.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  6. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

  7. Introduced in House

  8. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2875 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2875 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2875 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2875 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources