PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 4, 1993
Indian Fish and Wildlife Resource Enhancement Act of 1993 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to establish the Indian Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Program. Authorizes the Secretray to provide financial and technical assistance to enable Indian tribes to: (1) review and update tribal codes governing fish and wildlife management; (2) train personnel; and (3) assess fish and wildlife resources. Directs the Secretary to: (1) establish an Indian Fish Hatchery Program within the Bureau of Indian Affairs; and (2) enter into contracts with or grants to Indian tribes for an Indian Bison Conservation Program. Directs the Secretary to establish a Fish and Wildlife Resources Intern Program and related outreach postgraduate, scholarship, and recruitment programs. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Richardson, Bill [D-NM-3] · D–NM
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1972)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2874 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2874 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2874 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2874 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.