PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2845 / 114th Congress

AGOA Enhancement Act of 2015

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 706.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Dec 7, 2016

AGOA Enhancement Act of 2015

(Sec. 2) This bill states that it is U.S. policy to support efforts in sub-Saharan Africa to: (1) improve the rule of law, promote free elections, strengthen the private sector, and fight corruption; and (2) promote the role of women in social, political, and economic development.

(Sec. 3) The President shall establish the AGOA website for the collection and dissemination of information regarding the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The website shall include:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

information and technical assistance provided at U.S. Agency for International Development regional trade hubs, and

a link to U.S. embassy websites located in eligible sub-Saharan African countries.

The Department of State is urged to direct U.S. embassies in eligible sub-Saharan African countries to promote such countries' use of AGOA benefits, including through the use of a publicly available Internet link to the AGORA website.

The President is urged to, after each meeting of the United States-Sub-Saharan Africa Trade and Economic Cooperation Forum, publish on the AGOA website: (1) all outcomes of the meeting, including any member country and private sector commitments; and (2) an assessment of progress made regarding any commitments made by member countries and the private sector from the previous meeting.

(Sec. 4) The President is urged to:

implement policies to facilitate trans-boundary trade among eligible sub-Saharan African countries;

provide training for business and government trade officials on accessing AGOA benefits and other trade preference programs; and

provide capacity building for African entrepreneurs and trade associations on production strategies, quality standards, formation of cooperatives, and market research and market development;

provide capacity building training to promote product diversification and value-added processing; and

provide capacity building and technical assistance funding to help African businesses and institutions comply with U.S. counter-terrorism initiatives and policies.

"Eligible sub-Saharan African country" means a country that the President has determined meets AGORA eligibility requirements.

(Sec. 5) The Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 is amended to provide that an eligible country that has entered into and has in effect a Millennium Challenge Compact may also enter into and have in effect at the same time not more than one additional compact, if:

one or both of the compacts are or will be for purposes of regional economic integration, increased regional trade, or cross-border collaborations; and

the country is making considerable and demonstrable progress in implementing the terms of the existing compact.

(Sec. 6) Millennium Compacts for Regional Economic Integration Act or the M-CORE Act

The bill: (1) establishes, beginning with FY2013, new assistance criteria for a low-income or a lower middle income candidate country eligible to enter into a Millennium Challenge Compact with the United States, and (2) sets forth reclassification limits. A country qualifying for candidate status with a per capita income that changes during the fiscal year such that the country would be reclassified from a low income country to a lower middle income country or from a lower middle income country to a low income country shall retain its status in its former income classification for such fiscal year and the two subsequent fiscal years.

The bill amends consulting and reporting requirements for the Millennium Challenge Corporation's Board of Directors, including by requiring the board, before entering into a compact, to provide: (1) economic justification for the compact, (2) a risk management plan, and (3) congressional and public notification.

The corporation shall, before selecting a compact country, provide the board with information regarding the country's treatment of civil society.

The corporation is required submit a study to certain congressional committees that assesses the feasibility of developing partnerships at the sub national level within candidate countries.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Royce, Edward R. [R-CA-39] · R–CA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 706.

  2. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker with an amendment. Without written report.

  3. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker with an amendment. Without written report.

  4. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  5. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  6. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  7. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5149)

  8. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5149)

  9. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2845.

  10. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5149-5153)

  11. Mr. Royce moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  12. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

  13. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  15. Introduced in House

  16. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2845 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2845 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2845 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2845 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources