PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-84.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 13, 1999
Amends the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to authorize the Virgin Islands legislature to issue notes in anticipation of the collection of taxes or revenues as it may deem necessary and advisable for any public purpose authorized by it (thereby expanding the current list of authorized construction projects).Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an agreement with the Governor of the Virgin Islands establishing mutually agreed financial accountability and performance standards for fiscal operations of the Government of the Virgin Islands. Requires such agreement to be ratified by both parties of the legislature and forwarded to Congress.
People & committees
Del. Christensen, Donna MC [D-VI-At Large] · D–VI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-84.
Became Public Law No: 106-84.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S12851)
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S12851)
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8787)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8787)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2841.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8787-8788)
Mr. Saxton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 196.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-337.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-337.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2841 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2841 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2841 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2841 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.