Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1993

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 126.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 2, 1993

Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1994, 1995, and 1996 - Amends the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1994 to authorize FY 1994 through FY 1996 appropriations for specified areas of airway improvement research, engineering and development, and demonstrations. Provides for the establishment of a joint aviation research and development program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Valentine, Tim [D-NC-2] · D–NC

Committees

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Aug 31, 1993
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 126.
Aug 31, 1993
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. H. Rept. 103-225.
Aug 31, 1993
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. H. Rept. 103-225.
Aug 6, 1993
Mr. Hall (TX) asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Science, Space and Technology have until 5:00 p.m. on Aug. 30 to file a report on H.R. 2820. Agreed to without objection.
Aug 4, 1993
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Aug 4, 1993
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Aug 2, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
Aug 2, 1993
Introduced in House
Aug 2, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Aug 31, 1993 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in House · Aug 2, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 2739 · Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2820 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2820, 103rd Congress: Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2820

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-08-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2820/BILLS-103hr2820rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T15:21:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.2820 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2820 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2820, 103rd Congress: Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2820

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-08-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2820/BILLS-103hr2820rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T15:21:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2820 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2820 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2820, 103rd Congress: Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2820

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-08-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2820/BILLS-103hr2820rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T15:21:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2820 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2820 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2820, 103rd Congress: Federal Aviation Administration Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2820

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-08-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2820/BILLS-103hr2820rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T15:21:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2820 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.