Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

H.R.280 through Congress

H.R.280 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseJan 7, 2009IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (2)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.280.

Related Senate bill: S.22 Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009

Related Senate bill: S.159 Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 7, 2009

Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act - Establishes the Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park in New Jersey as a unit of the National Park System.

Sets forth conditions concerning the establishment of the Park.

Sets forth provisions regarding the administration of the Park.

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to complete a management plan for the Park.

Establishes the Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Advisory Commission to advise the Secretary in the development of the management plan.

Directs the Secretary to complete a study regarding the preservation and interpretation of Hinchliffe Stadium as listed on the National Register of Historic Places, which shall include an assessment of the potential for listing it as a National Historic Landmark as well as options for maintaining its historic integrity.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [D-NJ-8] · D–NJ

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Feb 4, 2009
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
Jan 7, 2009
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Jan 7, 2009
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E29-30)
Jan 7, 2009
Introduced in House
Jan 7, 2009
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jan 7, 2009 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 10, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.280 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.280, 111th Congress: Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/280

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2009-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hr280/BILLS-111hr280ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-10T15:15:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.280 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.280 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.280, 111th Congress: Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/280

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2009-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hr280/BILLS-111hr280ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-10T15:15:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.280 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.280 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.280, 111th Congress: Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/280

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2009-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hr280/BILLS-111hr280ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-10T15:15:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.280 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.280 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.280, 111th Congress: Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/280

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2009-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/111/bills/hr280/BILLS-111hr280ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-10T15:15:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.280 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.