PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 27, 1993
Insurance Anti-Redlining Act of 1993 - Requires certain designated sellers of insurance to submit annually to the Secretary of Commerce (the Secretary) specified information regarding where and to whom they have sold insurance. Directs the Secretary to establish publicly accessible central depositories of such information. Directs the Secretary to promulgate regulations to ensure that the termination practices used for agents who handle either private mortgage, property, or casualty insurance do not result in unfair discrimination against such agents because of either their geographic locations or that of their clients. Directs the Secretary to: (1) compile annually for each Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) aggregate data by census tract regarding certain designated insurers; and (2) produce tables for each MSA indicating aggregate insurance underwriting patterns for various categories of census tracts grouped according to location, age of property, income level, and racial characteristics.
People & committees
Rep. Foglietta, Thomas M. [D-PA-1] · D–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer Protection and Competitiveness.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to the House Committee on Banking, Finance + Urban Affrs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2753 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2753 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2753 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2753 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.