To require a reduction in the annual Department of Defense and Department of Transportation budgets by the total amount expended by those departments for pay and benefits and costs of investigation, administrative discharge, and any legal fees pertaining to such, for any member of the Armed Forces discharged during the preceding fiscal year on the basis of homosexual status or conduct for any grounds that do not apply equally to members of the Armed Forces who are heterosexual.

Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 26, 1993

Reduces the total amount available to the Department of Defense for obligation for each fiscal year by the total lifetime costs expended by the Army, Navy, or Marine Corps for each member of such service branch who is discharged for homosexuality. Requires appropriate allocation of such reductions. Makes an identical reduction in funds available to the Department of Transportation with respect to each member of the Coast Guard who is discharged for homosexuality.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Woolsey, Lynn C. [D-CA-6] · D–CA

Committees

Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee
Armed Services Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jul 28, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Jul 28, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from DOT.
Jul 28, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Forces and Personnel.
Jul 28, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Navigation.
Jul 26, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
Jul 26, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Jul 26, 1993
Introduced in House
Jul 26, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jul 26, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2743 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2743, 103rd Congress: To require a reduction in the annual Department of Defense and Department of Transportation budgets by the total amount expended by those departments for pay and benefits and costs of investigation, administrative discharge, and any legal fees pertaining to such, for any member of the Armed Forces discharged during the preceding fiscal year on the basis of homosexual status or conduct for any grounds that do not apply equally to members of the Armed Forces who are heterosexual.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2743

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-07-26.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2743/BILLS-103hr2743ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.2743 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2743 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2743, 103rd Congress: To require a reduction in the annual Department of Defense and Department of Transportation budgets by the total amount expended by those departments for pay and benefits and costs of investigation, administrative discharge, and any legal fees pertaining to such, for any member of the Armed Forces discharged during the preceding fiscal year on the basis of homosexual status or conduct for any grounds that do not apply equally to members of the Armed Forces who are heterosexual.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2743

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-07-26.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2743/BILLS-103hr2743ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2743 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2743 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2743, 103rd Congress: To require a reduction in the annual Department of Defense and Department of Transportation budgets by the total amount expended by those departments for pay and benefits and costs of investigation, administrative discharge, and any legal fees pertaining to such, for any member of the Armed Forces discharged during the preceding fiscal year on the basis of homosexual status or conduct for any grounds that do not apply equally to members of the Armed Forces who are heterosexual.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2743

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-07-26.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2743/BILLS-103hr2743ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2743 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2743 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.2743, 103rd Congress: To require a reduction in the annual Department of Defense and Department of Transportation budgets by the total amount expended by those departments for pay and benefits and costs of investigation, administrative discharge, and any legal fees pertaining to such, for any member of the Armed Forces discharged during the preceding fiscal year on the basis of homosexual status or conduct for any grounds that do not apply equally to members of the Armed Forces who are heterosexual.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2743

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-07-26.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr2743/BILLS-103hr2743ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:01Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.2743 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.