To make certain technical corrections in laws relating to Native Americans, and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 104-109.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Dec 6, 1995
Makes technical amendments to the following Acts: (1) an Act restoring Federal services to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians; (2) the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Act; (3) the Indian Dams Safety Act of 1994; (4) an Act extending Federal benefits to the Pascua Yaqui Indians of Arizona; (5) the Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994; (6) the American Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act of 1994; (7) the Indian Self- Determination Contract Reform Act of 1994; (8) the Auburn Indian Restoration Act; (9) the Crow Boundary Settlement Act of 1994; (10) the Tlingit and Haida Status Clarification Act; and (11) the Native American Languages Act. (Sec. 12) Amends: (1) the Ponca Restoration Act to include within the tribal service area Sarpy, Burt, Platte, Stanton, Holt, Hall, and Wayne counties in Nebraska and Woodbury and Pottawattomie counties in Iowa; and (2) the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1994 to extend the agreement and publication deadline. (Sec. 14) Provides for revocation of the incorporation charter of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe under the Indian Reorganization Act. (Sec. 15) Amends: (1) the Advisory Council on California Indian Policy Act of 1992 to extend a specified reporting deadline; and (2) the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 to extend a specified settlement agreement deadline. (Sec. 17) Authorizes the Secretary of the Army to transfer funds to the Department of the Interior for operation of certain Columbia River fishing sites for the Nez Perce, Umatilla, Warm Springs, and Yakima Tribes. (Sec. 18) Authorizes: (1) the Ponca Indian Tribe of Nebraska to use specified funds for an adolescent transitional living facility; and (2) the Secretary of the Interior to reprogram, in accordance with resolutions approved by the Mescalero Apache Tribal Council on January 24, 1995, all remaining funds regarding specific changes in the secretarial plans for the use of specified funds awarded in satisfaction of the judgments by the Indian Claims Commission. (Sec. 20) Amends the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Act to authorize the Band to amend its base membership roll if certain conditions are met.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 407 - 0 (Roll No. 15).
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H763-767)
Mr. Gallegly moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 217.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-444.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-444.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2726 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2726 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2726 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2726 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.