PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2724 / 107th Congress

Music Online Competition Act of 2001

Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 2, 2001

Music Online Competition Act of 2001 - Revises Federal copyright law to extend the exemption from infringement liability to a performance of: (1) a sound recording by digital audio transmission, by or in a physical vending establishment open to the public at large without any direct or indirect admission charge, where the sole purpose of the performance is to promote the retail sale of copies or phonorecords of the work, or of the audiovisual or other devices utilized in such performance, and the performance is not transmitted beyond the place where the establishment is located and is within the immediate area where the sale is occurring; or (2) a sample of a nondramatic musical work or a sample of a sound recording by digital audio transmission, by or through a digital online service open to the public at large without such admission charge if the purpose of the performance is to promote the retail sale, distribution or license, by or through the service, of copies or phonorecords of the work, including by digital phonorecord delivery, the transmitting entity transmits the sample solely to the particular recipient requesting the transmission, and the length of the sample does not exceed 30 seconds or, in the case of a sound recording of more than five minutes in duration, ten percent of that sound recording not to exceed 60 seconds.Modifies conditions under which the current ephemeral recording exemption is extended to multiple copies or phonorecords of a particular transmission program embodying the performance or display of certain copyright work, including broadcast transmission of a performance of a sound recording in a digital format on a nonsubscription basis.Sets forth provisions: (1) revising the allocation of statutory performance license payments for digital audio transmission of public performances of sound recordings; (2) regarding licensing of affiliates by copyright owners of sound recordings to reproduce, to distribute to the public by means of a digital phonorecord delivery, or (as in current law) to perform the copyrighted work in public; and (3) revising requirements for the electronic administration of the compulsory license for making and distributing sound recordings (including the notice of intent, limited digital phonorecord delivery, and electronic filing of the notice of intent with the Copyright Office).Extends the exemption of copyright infringement liability: (1) to the making of a copy or phonorecord of a sound recording or a work included in a sound recording, in a digital format, if such copy or phonorecord is created by and is incidental to the operation of a device in the ordinary course of the use of a work otherwise lawful; and (2) for the owner of a phonorecord lawfully acquired by digital phonorecord delivery, or a copy lawfully acquired by digital transmission of a literary work embodied in that phonorecord, to make another phonorecord or copy of such works, if such new phonorecord or copy is for archival purposes only and that all archival phonorecords or copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the phonorecord or copy should cease to be rightful.Requires the Register of Copyrights to evaluate the impact of certain statutory sound recording performance license criteria on noninteractive digital audio transmissions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Cannon, Chris [R-UT-3] · R–UT

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2724 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2724 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2724 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2724 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources