PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2692 / 105th Congress

Department of Agriculture Civil Rights and Efficiency Act of 1997

Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from USDA.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 22, 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Department of Agriculture Reorganization Title II: Implementation of Recommendations of Civil Rights Action Team Title III: Effective Date Department of Agriculture Civil Rights and Efficiency Act of 1997 - Title I: Department of Agriculture Reorganization - Establishes in the Department of Agriculture the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Foreign Agriculture and Agricultural Field Services. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to delegate to the Under Secretary functions and duties of: (1) the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services; and (2) the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment (other than Forest Service functions). Makes conforming amendments to the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 and to specified Federal law. (Sec. 102) Establishes in the Department the position of Under Secretary for Forestry. Directs the Secretary to delegate (to such Under Secretary) Forest Service functions and duties of the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment. Makes conforming amendments to the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 and to specified Federal law. (Sec. 103) Directs the Secretary to: (1) establish in the Department a Farm Service Agency (Agency); and (2) assign to such Agency functions of the Consolidated Farm Service Agency and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Makes conforming amendments to the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. (Sec. 104) Authorizes Agency use of Federal and non-Federal employees, with specified provisions concerning County Executive Directors. (Sec. 105) Directs the Secretary to issue regulations concerning management of State, county, and area offices of the Agency. Title II: Implementation of Recommendations of Civil Rights Team - Defines "socially disadvantaged group" and "socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher" for purposes of this title. (Sec. 202) Amends the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act to increase county and area committee membership by two nonvoting members appointed by the Secretary who shall advise the committee regarding Department policies to promote the interests of socially disadvantaged groups. (Sec. 203) Authorizes the Secretary to remove a committee member for misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency, or a committee employee for discriminating in administering a Department program or activity. (Sec. 204) Authorizes the Secretary to establish an Office of Civil Rights Protection for Program Participants under the jurisdiction of the Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Administration. (Sec. 206) Requires the Secretary to approve related legal settlements of $25,000 or more. (Sec. 207) Requires an agricultural census to sample each socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher. (Sec. 208) Directs the Secretary to study Department and committee hiring practices in order to make recommendations for increased hiring of socially disadvantaged group members. (Sec. 209) Directs the (Department's) Inspector General to: (1) include in each report audits of Department civil rights rules and policies and legal settlements; and (2) report on nepotism and conflicts of interest in the Department. Title III: Effective Date - Sets forth the effective date for amendments made by this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Smith, Robert [R-OR-2] · R–OR

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from USDA.

  2. Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

  3. Committee Hearings Held.

  4. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2692 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2692 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2692 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2692 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources