PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2674 / 106th Congress

Palmetto Bend Conveyance Act

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 490.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 2, 1999

Palmetto Bend Conveyance Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior: (1) on receipt of a specified payment from the State of Texas (acting through the Texas Water Development Board and/or the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority), to convey the Palmetto Bend Reclamation Project (excluding the mineral estate) to the State; (2) to complete the conveyance expeditiously, including such actions as may be required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; and (3) to report to specified congressional committees if the conveyance is completed later than one year and 180 days after the enactment date of this Act.Extinguishes the State's obligation under a specified Bureau of Reclamation contract upon payment of such amount. Requires the State to bear the cost of all boundary surveys, title searches, appraisals, and other transaction costs for the conveyance. Requires State payments to the Secretary to be credited to the Reclamation Fund in the Treasury.Provides that: (1) the land, water, facilities, and mineral estate of the Project shall continue to be managed by the State and operated for ensuring the implementation of fish, wildlife, and recreational activities; (2) all mineral interests in the Project retained by the United States on completion of the conveyance shall be subject to continued use by the State for purposes for which the Project was authorized; and (3) the Project's surface estate may be used for exploration, development, or oil, gas, or mineral production only on approval by the State.Deauthorizes the Project effective on the date of its conveyance.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Paul, Ron [R-TX-14] · R–TX

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 490.

    2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-832.

    3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-832.

    4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    6. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    7. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    8. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water and Power.

    9. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    10. Introduced in House

    11. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2674 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2674 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2674 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2674 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources