PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2656 / 103rd Congress

Security Officers Employment Standards Act of 1993

Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 15, 1993

Security Officers Employment Standards Act of 1993 - Requires each State: (1) to allocate not less than five percent of funds received under title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to the implementation of the requirements of this Act; and (2) to have in effect screening, training, and other requirements and procedures for issuing licenses to, and reviewing security services of, security contractors. Sets limits on license fees. Bars an employer from assigning an employee to duty as a private security officer (officer) until such employee obtains a security officer's registration permit, with exceptions. Requires each State to have in effect a permit program that prohibits employers from assigning an employee to such duty until the employer submits to the State regulatory agency specified certifications, including certifications with respect to: (1) employment history and personal references; (2) passage of a drug screening test that meets National Institute on Drug Abuse guidelines; (3) a check of records obtained at the request of the employer through the National Crime Information Center and fingerprint records on file with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (makes provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 inapplicable to the disclosure of such records); and (4) a psychological evaluation approved by the State regulatory agency and conducted by a qualified individual. Amends the Federal judicial code to authorize the Attorney General to exchange records and information with private employers whose primary business consists of contracting to provide the services of a security officer. Directs the Attorney General to issue rules establishing procedures for the disclosure of records requested by employers and requiring such employers to pay a specified fee to the disclosing agency. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) training requirements for officers; and (2) State issuance of registration permits. Requires States to have in effect: (1) specified requirements regarding notice of, and permit suspension and revocation based on, criminal charges against an officer; and (2) a law authorizing the imposition of a penalty for violation of requirements imposed by the State to satisfy a condition of eligibility of a security contractor.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Sundquist, Don [R-TN-7] · R–TN

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Education and Workforce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

    4. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

    5. Introduced in House

    6. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2656 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2656 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2656 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2656 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources