PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2615 / 115th Congress

Gulf Islands National Seashore Land Exchange Act

Became Public Law No: 115-279.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 20, 2018

Gulf Islands National Seashore Land Exchange Act

(Sec. 3) This bill authorizes the National Park Service (NPS) to convey approximately 1.542 acres of federal land located within the Gulf Islands National Seashore in Jackson County, Mississippi, to the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 5699 in exchange for approximately 2.161 acres located in the county (the nonfederal land). The values of the parcels to be exchanged shall be determined by an independent appraiser in accordance with nationally recognized appraisal standards. If the values of such parcels are not equal, their values shall be equalized through a cash payment or adjustments to their acreage.

The NPS shall require the post to pay or reimburse the costs incurred by the NPS to carry out such exchange.

The bill subjects the exchange of the federal and nonfederal lands to valid existing rights.

Any nonfederal land acquired by the United States under this bill shall be administered as part of the Gulf Islands National Seashore.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Palazzo, Steven M. [R-MS-4] · R–MS

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 115-279.

    2. Became Public Law No: 115-279.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 375 - 1 (Roll no. 417). (text: CR H9484-9485)

      House roll call 417 · Individual votes
    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 375 - 1 (Roll no. 417).(text: CR H9484-9485)

      House roll call 417 · Individual votes
    10. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

    11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Senate amendment to H.R. 2615.

    12. Mr. Gosar moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H9484-9485, H9501)

    13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    14. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6875-6876; text: CR S6875-6876)

    15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S6875-6876; text: CR S6875-6876)

    16. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 376.

    17. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 115-228.

    18. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 115-228.

    19. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    20. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 115-504.

    21. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    22. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    23. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9442)

    24. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9442)

    25. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2615.

    26. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9442-9443)

    27. Mr. Tipton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    28. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 216.

    29. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-302.

    30. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-302.

    31. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    32. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    33. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

    34. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    35. Introduced in House

    36. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2615 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2615 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2615 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2615 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources