PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 1, 1993
Amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to set forth maximum deficit amounts starting with FY 1994 which reduce the deficit to zero by the end of FY 2000. Repeals the budget agreement enforcement provisions of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Applies to FY 1994 through 2000 the emergency powers to eliminate deficits in excess of the maximum deficit amount set forth under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act), as in effect immediately prior to November 5, 1990. Extends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 until September 30, 2001.
People & committees
Rep. Gekas, George W. [R-PA-17] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Operations.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1712)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 4, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2585 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2585 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2585 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2585 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.