PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2579 / 116th Congress

Hardrock Leasing and Reclamation Act of 2019

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · Aug 4, 2020

Hardrock Leasing and Reclamation Act of 2019

This bill addresses mineral leasing, exploration, and development on federal land.

Among other things, the bill

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

prohibits the issuance of a patent for certain mining or millsite claims;

establishes a permitting and leasing system for hardrock mining;

establishes a 12.5% royalty on new mining operations and an 8% royalty on existing operations, with an exemption for small miners;

protects special places, such as wilderness study areas, roadless areas, and wild and scenic rivers, from hardrock mining activity;

requires consultation prior to undertaking any mineral activities that may have a substantial direct impact on the lands or interests of Indian tribes;

establishes an environmental standard for mining activities to ensure that mining activities prevent undue degradation of public lands and resources;

prescribes requirements for the exploration permit process and for operations permits, including financial assurances; and

authorizes the use of amounts in the Hardrock Minerals Reclamation Fund for the reclamation and restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by past hardrock mineral activities and related activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-3] · D–AZ

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
27 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 116-467.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 116-467.

  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 13.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  6. Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged.

  7. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  8. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

  9. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  10. Introduced in House

  11. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2579 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2579 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2579 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2579 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources