PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2551 / 117th Congress

Bonneville Shoreline Trail Advancement Act

Received in the Senate.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 12, 2022

Bonneville Shoreline Trail Advancement Act

This bill modifies the wilderness designations of certain lands in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest in Utah.

The bill designates approximately 326.27 acres in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest as part of the Mount Olympus Wilderness.

The bill also removes the following lands in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest from designation as wilderness:

approximately 11.17 acres in the Mount Naomi Wilderness,

approximately 197.4 acres in the Mount Olympus Wilderness,

approximately 9.8 acres in the Twin Peaks Wilderness, and

approximately 107.9 acres in the Lone Peak Wilderness Area.

The lands removed from designation as wilderness shall be managed as part of the forest.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Curtis, John R. [R-UT-3] · R–UT

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9679)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9679)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2551.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9678-9680)

  7. Mr. Grijalva moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 411.

  9. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-570.

  10. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-570.

  11. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

  12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  13. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Discharged.

  14. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  15. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.

  16. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  17. Introduced in House

  18. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2551 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2551 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2551 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2551 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources