PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2532 / 106th Congress

National Heritage Areas Policy Act of 1999

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 15, 1999

National Heritage Areas Policy Act of 1999 - Allows an area to be designated a national heritage area only if: (1) it meets specified criteria, including having natural, cultural, or historic features and its residents, local nonprofit organizations and entities, and governments are willing to support such designation and manage it; and (2) it is so designated by an Act of Congress.Directs the Secretary of the Interior to submit to specified congressional committees a study on the feasibility of designating any such area. Limits the Federal share of costs for such studies to 50 percent. Directs the Secretary to annually submit to Congress a prioritized list of projects at such areas, based on submissions from governors of affected States. Authorizes the Secretary to make grants to local coordinating entities for reports, studies, interpretive exhibits and programs, historic preservation projects, and operating expenses at an area. Limits such grants to a ten-year period beginning on the date of designation. Prohibits such grants after three years unless the local coordinating entity submits a Heritage Plan for such area and each affected governor approves the Plan. Authorizes the Secretary to provide grants and technical assistance for an area previously designated by an Act of Congress, under certain conditions. Protects private property owners from provisions of this Act.Authorizes appropriations, with a $10 million annual limit and a limit of $1 million for any one area during a fiscal year.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hefley, Joel [R-CO-5] · R–CO

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  2. Referred to Department of the Interior for comments.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

  4. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2532 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2532 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2532 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2532 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources