PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.
Congressional Research Service
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 13, 1993
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 BLM Authorization Act - Amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to authorize appropriations for programs, functions, and activities of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of the Department of the Interior for FY 1994 through 1995. Changes the date for the Secretary of the Interior's submission of a request of authorizations for BLM programs, functions, and activities.
People & committees
Rep. Vento, Bruce F. [D-MN-4] · D–MN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6605-6606)
Mr. Vento moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 218 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2530 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. Points of order recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. All points of order against the amendent printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution are waived.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 95.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-171.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-171.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1626)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2530 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2530 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2530 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2530 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.