PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.For Further Action See H.R.3534.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 25, 1995
Amends the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to delete provisions which require the Secretary of the Interior to review leases or permits before their renewal or extension on Federal land within the Mineral King Addition of the Sequoia National Park, California. Requires such leases to be renewed or extended under their original terms and conditions. Grants renewal or extension of leases and permits to persons who held the leases or permits on November 10, 1978, or their heirs (currently, such persons). Allows the Secretary to terminate such lease or permit only for a breach of the specific conditions detailed in it. Directs the Secretary to grant the heirs of the person a renewal or extension of a lease or permit that was continued under the Act, that was held by a person who died after November 10, 1978, and that expired on or before this Act's enactment without being renewed or extended in the same manner as leases and permits are otherwise renewed or extended under the Act and under the same terms and conditions applicable to such leases or permits.
People & committees
Rep. Radanovich, George [R-CA-19] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
For Further Action See H.R.3534.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Lands.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2528 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2528 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2528 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2528 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.