PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2513 / 106th Congress

To direct the Administrator of General Services to acquire a building located in Terre Haute, Indiana, and for other purposes.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 14, 1999

Directs the Administrator of General Services to acquire by transfer from the U.S. Postal Service the real property and improvements located at 30 North Seventh Street in Terre Haute, Indiana. Provides that such transfer shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Administrator shall provide to the Postal Service an option to occupy 8,000 square feet of renovated space in the building at no cost for a 20-year term. Requires the Administrator to renovate such building and acquire parking spaces to accommodate use of the building by the Administrator and the U.S. Postal Service. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Pease, Edward A. [R-IN-7] · R–IN

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    2. Received in the Senate.

    3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    4. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    5. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2513.

    7. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11231-11234)

    8. Mr. Horn moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    9. Committee Hearings Held.

    10. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

    11. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    12. Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.

    13. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, Hazardous Materials and Pipeline Transportation.

    14. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    15. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    16. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    17. Introduced in House

    18. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2513 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2513 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2513 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2513 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources