PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 17, 2001
Defense Production Act Amendments of 2001 - Amends the Defense Production Act of 1950 to extend its expiration date and authorization of appropriations through FY 2004.
People & committees
Rep. King, Peter T. [R-NY-3] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-47.
Became Public Law No: 107-47.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to House amendments to Senate amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9856-9857; text as Senate agreed to House amendments: CR S9857)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House amendments to Senate amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9856-9857; text as Senate agreed to House amendments: CR S9857)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate amendment.
Mr. Oxley asked unanimous consent that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendment.
On motion that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9673)
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5355)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5355)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2510.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5355-5357)
Mr. Oxley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 102.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 107-173.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 107-173.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2510 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2510 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2510 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2510 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.