PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.247 / 110th Congress

To designate a Forest Service trail at Waldo Lake in the Willamette National Forest in the State of Oregon as a national recreation trail in honor of Jim Weaver, a former Member of the House of Representatives.

Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5530)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 5, 2007

Designates Forest Service trail number 3590 in the Willamette National Forest in Lane County, Oregon, that begins and ends at North Waldo Campground and circumnavigates Waldo Lake, as a national recreation trail that shall be known as the "Jim Weaver Loop Trail" in honor of Jim Weaver, a former Member of the House of Representatives.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4] · D–OR

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5530)

  2. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 361.

  3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. With written report No. 110-163.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. With written report No. 110-163.

  5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Senate Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 110-104.

  7. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2132)

  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2132)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 247.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2131-2132)

  13. Mr. Grijalva moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

  15. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H774)

  16. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  17. Introduced in House

  18. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.247 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.247 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.247 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.247 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources