PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2459 / 103rd Congress

Federal Bureau of Investigation Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1994

Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 18, 1993

Federal Bureau of Investigation Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1994 - Authorizes appropriations to carry out the activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for FY 1994. Directs the FBI to fully support implementation of NCIC 2000 by the States. Bars the use of funds authorized by this Act to relocate management and administrative operations for the National Crime Information Center or the Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Authorizes the Attorney General to use funds authorized to be appropriated for the FBI to make payments for the conduct of its activities. Bars the use of such payments to pay the compensation of any employee in the competitive service, but permits payments for: (1) expenses necessary for the detection and prosecution of crimes against the United States; (2) protection of the President and the Attorney General; (3) investigations regarding official matters under the control of the Department of Justice and the Department of State; and (4) acquisition, collection, classification, and preservation of identification and other records and their exchange with, and for the official use of, authorized officials of the Federal Government, States, cities, and other institutions, with such exchange subject to cancellation if dissemination is made outside the receiving departments or agencies.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Edwards, Don [D-CA-16] · D–CA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2459 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2459 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2459 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2459 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources