Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1246-1247)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 12, 2003
Secure Annuity Income for Life Act of 2003 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude from gross income a percentage of lifetime annuity payments from a qualified trust to a qualified distributee. Provides for recapture and taxation of payments that are modified (other than by death or disability) so as to not qualify as lifetime annuity payments.
Applies such exclusion to: (1) section 403(a) plans (employee annuities); (2) section 403(b) plans (public schools and certain tax exempt organizations); (3) section 408 plans (individual retirement accounts); and (4) section 457 plans (deferred compensation plans for State and local governments and tax-exempt organizations).
Defines: (1) "lifetime annuity payment"; and (2) "qualified distributee."
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 18, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2458 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2458 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2458 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2458 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.