PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 27, 2025
Prescription Drug Transparency and Affordability Act
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to report, at least once every six months, prescription drug pricing, payment, and utilization data to the health insurance plans for which the PBM provides services.Specifically, a PBM contracted to provide services to an employer or sponsor offering a large group health insurance plan (i.e., a plan with at least 100 employees or participants) must report to the plan certain information for prescription drug claims under the plan. This includes, for each drug, the difference between the compensation paid by the plan to the PBM and the compensation paid by the PBM to the pharmacy.
Further, for each therapeutic class of drugs under the plan, a PBM must report (1) the total amount it received in rebates, fees, and discounts; and (2) the net spending for each class after such rebates, fees, and discounts.Each PBM also must report certain information about (1) drugs for which total spending exceeded $10,000; and (2) drugs dispensed through pharmacies affiliated with the plan or PBM, such as the percentage of prescriptions dispensed by such affiliates.Finally, a PBM providing services to any group health insurance plan must provide the plan with a summary document that includes similar information for prescription drug claims under the plan, as determined by the Department of Health and Human Services. Plans must also make certain aggregate summary information available to plan participants.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
PBMs and plans that violate these requirements are subject to civil penalties.
People & committees
Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 25, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2450 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2450 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2450 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2450 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.