PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2437 / 104th Congress

To provide for the exchange of certain lands in Gilpin County, Colorado.

Became Public Law No: 104-158.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 29, 1995

Directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey to Lake Gulch, Inc., a Colorado corporation, specified lands in Gilpin County, Colorado, in exchange for: (1) certain lands comprising approximately 40 acres located in Larimer County, Colorado, within the boundaries of Rocky Mountain National Park; (2) certain lands located within and adjacent to the United States Bureau of Land Management San Luis Resource Area in Conejos County, Colorado; and (3) certain lands located within the United States Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Resource Area in Huerfano County, Colorado. Allows the Secretary of the Interior and Lake Gulch to agree to substitute alternative lands if one or more of the precise offered land parcels is unable to be conveyed. Directs the Secretary to notify and consult with the County and City and afford such units of local government the opportunity to acquire or reserve easements or rights-of-way parallel to North Clear Creek in Gilpin, Colorado, prior to transferring any lands which are contiguous to North Clear Creek out of public ownership. Expresses that the exchange will be contingent upon Lake Gulch executing an agreement with the United States: (1) containing terms which are acceptable to the Secretary of the Interior; (2) granting the United States a covenant that none of the selected lands (which currently lie outside the legally approved gaming area) will ever be used for gaming; and (3) permanently holding the United States harmless for liability and indemnifying the United States against all costs arising from activities, operations, or other acts conducted by Lake Gulch or its employees, agents, successors or assigns on the selected lands after their transfer to Lake Gulch.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McInnis, Scott [R-CO-3] · R–CO

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-158.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-158.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7066)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S7066)

    10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 297.

    11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-196.

    12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-196.

    13. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported in lieu of S. 985 without amendment favorably.

    14. Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.

    15. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    17. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    18. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11801-11803)

    21. Mr. Cooley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    22. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 157.

    23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-305.

    24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-305.

    25. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    26. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    27. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    28. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    29. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Lands.

    30. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    31. Introduced in House

    32. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2437 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2437 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2437 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2437 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources