PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 104-210.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 29, 1995
Amends the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to eliminate references to the Good Samaritan Food Donation Act as only a model law.
People & committees
Rep. Danner, Pat [D-MO-6] · D–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 104-210.
Became Public Law No: 104-210.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H10089-10090)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H10089-10090)
Mr. Goodling asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendments.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 5149 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 5149 proposed by Senator Santorum for Senator Kennedy.
Amendment SP 5148 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 5148 proposed by Senator Santorum for Senator Leahy.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S9532-9533)
Received in the Senate, read twice.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7477-7480)
Mr. Goodling moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Mr. Canady asked unanimous consent That on Friday, July 12, 1996, the Speaker be authorized to entertain a motion, offered by Mr. Goodling, or his designee, to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 2428 as amended. Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 338.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Economic and Educational. H. Rept. 104-661.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Economic and Educational. H. Rept. 104-661.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-Long Learning Discharged.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-Long Learning.
Referred to the House Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2428 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2428 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2428 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2428 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.