PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 104-138.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 28, 1995
Designates the United States Customs Administrative Building at the Ysleta-Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, as the Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building.
People & committees
Rep. Coleman, Ronald D. [D-TX-16] · D–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 104-138.
Became Public Law No: 104-138.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3414-3415)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S3414-3415)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 357.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H14978-14979)
Mr. Gilchrest moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 158.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 104-415.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 104-415.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Economic Development.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation.
Committee on Ways and Means discharged.
Committee on Ways and Means discharged.
Mr. Gilchrest asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Ways and Means be discharged from consideration of the bill and that the bill be rereferred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Agreed to without objection.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. (Referral Suspended).
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1866)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2415 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2415 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2415 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2415 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.