PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2413 / 106th Congress

Computer Security Enhancement Act of 2000

Received in the Senate.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Sep 21, 2000

Computer Security Enhancement Act of 2000 - Amends the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act to require the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in fulfilling its responsibilities under the computer standards program, to: (1) upon request from the private sector, assist in establishing voluntary interoperable standards, guidelines, and associated methods and techniques to facilitate and expedite the establishment of non-Federal public key management infrastructures that can be used to communicate with and conduct transactions with the Federal Government; and (2) provide assistance to Federal agencies in the protection of computer networks, promote Federal compliance with existing computer information security and privacy guidelines, and assist Federal response efforts related to unauthorized access to Federal computer systems.(Sec. 5) Requires the Institute to: (1) carry out specified activities in the development of uniform standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive information in certain Federal computer systems; (2) maintain and make available to Federal agencies and the public a list of commercially available, tested, and certified computer information security products; and (3) report annually to Congress on evaluations and tests of Federal computer systems, planned evaluations, and recommendations.(Sec. 6) Directs the Institute to solicit the recommendations of the Computer System Security and Privacy Advisory Board regarding standards and guidelines that are being considered for submittal to the Secretary of Commerce.Authorizes separate appropriations for FY 2001 and 2002 to enable the Board to identify emerging issues related to computer security, privacy, and cryptography and to convene public meetings on those subjects, receive presentations, and publish reports, digests, and summaries for public distribution on those subjects.(Sec. 7) Prohibits the Institute from promulgating, enforcing, or otherwise adopting standards, or carrying out activities or policies, for the Federal establishment of encryption standards required for use in computer systems other than Federal Government computer systems.(Sec. 8) Revises specified requirements, including authorizing (currently, requiring) the Institute, for the purposes of performing research and conducting studies, to draw upon computer system security guidelines developed by the National Security Agency.(Sec. 9) Amends the Computer Security Act of 1987 to revise requirements regarding Federal computer system security training to require such training to include emphasis on protecting sensitive information in Federal databases and Federal computer sites that are accessible through public networks.(Sec. 10) Authorizes appropriations for FY 2001 and 2002 for fellowships to support students at institutions of higher learning in computer security.(Sec. 11) Requires a study by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences of public key infrastructures. Authorizes appropriations for carrying out the study.(Sec. 12) Directs the Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology (Under Secretary) to: (1) promote an increased use of security technologies to enhance the protection of the Nation's information infrastructure; (2) establish a central repository of information for dissemination to the public to promote awareness of information security vulnerability and risks; and (3) promote the development of the national, standards-based infrastructure needed to support government, commercial and private uses of encryption technologies for confidentiality and authentication.(Sec. 13) Directs the NIST Director to: (1) develop electronic authentication infrastructure guidelines and standards to enable Federal agencies to select and utilize electronic authentication technologies in a manner that is sufficiently secure and interoperable; (2) maintain and make available to Federal agencies and the public a list of commercially available electronic authentication products, and other such products used by Federal agencies, evaluated as conforming with such guidelines and standards; (3) establish core specifications for particular electronic certification and management technologies by Federal agencies and advise Federal agencies for evaluating the conformance of such systems with such criteria; (4) maintain and make available to Federal agencies a list of such systems evaluated as conforming to such criteria; and (5) transmit annual reports to Congress on agency conformance with these matters.Establishes a National Policy Panel for Digital Signatures to serve as a forum for exploring all relevant factors associated with the development of a national digital signature infrastructure based on uniform guidelines and standards to enable the widespread availability and use of digital signature systems. Requires the Under Secretary to transmit to Congress a report containing the Panel's recommendations.(Sec. 14) Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-9] · R–WI

Committees

  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H10606-10608)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H10606-10608)

  5. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10708)

  6. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Hall (TX) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2413.

  8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR S10606-10610)

  9. Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 527.

  11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 106-876.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 106-876.

  13. Ordered to be Reported Without Recommendation (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  14. Committee Hearings Held.

  15. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  16. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Technology.

  18. Subcommittee Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Technology Prior to Referral.

  19. Referred to the House Committee on Science.

  20. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1491-1492)

  21. Introduced in House

  22. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2413 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2413 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2413 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2413 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources