Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2378 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2378 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2378 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2378 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 10, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-26 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposed Defining Male and Female Act of 2025 would set definitions for interpreting federal laws and federal agency rules and interpretations. For individual people, it would define sex as an unchangeable classification of male or female, using reproductive-system definitions tied to conception. It would also define related family and age terms and prohibit the federal government from recognizing gender identity as a replacement for sex.
Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Defining Male and Female Act of 2025.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various departments and Federal agencies of the United States
(3) female, when used to refer to a natural person, means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing eggs (ova)
(6) male, when used to refer to a natural person, means a person belonging, at conception, to the biological sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing sperm
(9) sex, when referring to a natural person's individual’s sex, means the person’s immutable biological classification as either male or female, as biologically determined and defined by this section
Section 2 would add a new section 9 to Chapter 1 of title 1 of the United States Code. Its definitions would apply when interpreting any act of Congress or any federal department or agency ruling, regulation, or interpretation.
Check the source
Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 9. Definition of sex, male, female, and related terms In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various departments and Federal agencies of the United States
For individual people, the proposal would define female and male by membership, at conception, in a sex characterized by a reproductive system whose biological function is producing eggs or sperm, respectively. It would define sex as an unchangeable male-or-female classification under those definitions.
Check the sources
(3) female, when used to refer to a natural person, means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing eggs (ova)
(6) male, when used to refer to a natural person, means a person belonging, at conception, to the biological sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing sperm
(9) sex, when referring to a natural person's individual’s sex, means the person’s immutable biological classification as either male or female, as biologically determined and defined by this section
The proposal characterizes gender identity as an internal, subjective sense of self disconnected from biological reality and sex. On that stated basis, it would prohibit federal recognition of gender identity as a replacement for sex. This characterization is the bill's language, not an independently established finding.
Check the source
(4) gender identity means an identity that reflects an internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an indeterminate continuum, and, because such an identity does not provide a meaningful basis for identification for purposes of Federal law, the term shall not be recognized by the Federal Government as a replacement for sex
The proposal would define boy and girl as male and female minors, and man and woman as male and female adults. It expressly preserves the use of man as a general reference to human beings.
The supplied actions snapshot, updated December 5, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on the Judiciary on March 26, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-12-05T22:54:39Z.
2025-03-26: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2025-03-26: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-26. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying earmark disclosures and committee materials were not supplied.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow benefit, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
What this analysis cannot establish
The supplied full text is the introduced proposal. The dated actions snapshot does not establish later legislative progress or enactment; missing later actions do not prove that neither occurred.
Existing Chapter 1 and the federal laws and agency rules affected by these definitions are not reproduced. The bundle does not establish how the proposal would change particular programs, rights, or individual cases.
The supplied text states no express implementation date, separate enforcement process, or termination condition, and does not explain how disputed classifications would be resolved.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Dec 5, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI