PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3515)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 10, 1993
Federal Employee Antistalking Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal criminal code to set penalties for persons who: (1) repeatedly engage in a pattern of conduct directed at an officer or employee in the executive or legislative branch of Government (including the U.S. Postal Service) while such officer or employee is engaged in, or on account of, official duties; (2) know or should know that such conduct is likely to place that officer or employee in reasonable fear of sexual battery, bodily injury, or death; and (3) thereby induce such fear. Specifies that if a sentence of probation is imposed the court shall require the defendant to undergo appropriate psychiatric, psychological, or social counseling. Allows an aggrieved officer or employee to obtain appropriate relief in a civil action, including punitive damages (in the case of a violation) and reasonable attorney's fees.
People & committees
Rep. Collins, Barbara-Rose [D-MI-15] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3515)
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2370 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2370 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2370 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2370 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.