PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.235 / 103rd Congress

Idaho Land Exchange Act of 1993

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 5, 1993

Idaho Land Exchange Act of 1993 - Adjusts the boundaries of the Targhee National Forest in Idaho. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to Idaho, acting through the Regents of its University, the Clark Fork Ranger Station within the Kaniksu National Forest in exchange for Idaho conveying to the Secretary the Clark Fork Land Exchange. Provides that if the lands exchanged between the United States and Idaho are not of equal value, the values shall be equalized in accordance with provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, except that the value of the improvements made by the University on the Clark Fork Ranger Station under the Granger-Thye permit shall be excluded from consideration in such valuation. Adjusts the boundaries of the Kaniksu National Forest to include the lands conveyed by Idaho.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. LaRocco, Larry [D-ID-1] · D–ID

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.

    2. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

    3. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

    4. Referred to the Subcommittee on Specialty Crops and Natural Resources.

    5. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Agriculture for a period ending not later than March 26, 1993 for consideration of such provisions of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee pursuant to clause 1)(a), rule X.

    6. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-42, Part I.

    7. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-42, Part I.

    8. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    9. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    10. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.

    11. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    12. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    13. Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

    14. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

    15. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    16. Introduced in House

    17. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.235 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.235 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.235 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.235 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources