PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Executive Comment Received from EPA.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 27, 2001
Southern Ute and Colorado Intergovernmental Agreement Implementation Act of 2001 - Authorizes the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to treat the Southern Ute Indian Tribe in the same manner as a State under the Clean Air Act for air program applications that the Tribe submits to the EPA to implement the Intergovernmental Agreement entered into by the Tribe and the State of Colorado providing for the regulation of air quality within the Southern Ute Indian Reservation.Permits, in the event any person fails to comply with a final civil order of the Tribe or the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission made pursuant to an air quality program established under such Agreement, the Tribe or the Commission to file a petition for declaratory or injunctive relief or for other orders in aid of enforcement.Provides for judicial review of a final action of the Commission.
People & committees
Rep. McInnis, Scott [R-CO-3] · R–CO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Executive Comment Received from EPA.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality.
Executive Comment Requested from EPA.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2344 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2344 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2344 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2344 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.