PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-76.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 27, 2001
Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002 - Makes FY 2002 appropriations for the: (1) Department of Agriculture; (2) Food and Drug Administration; (3) Commodity Futures Trading Commission; and; (4) Farm Credit Administration.Specifies certain uses and limits on or prohibitions against the use of funds appropriated by this Act.
People & committees
Rep. Bonilla, Henry [R-TX-23] · R–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-76.
Became Public Law No: 107-76.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 92 - 7. Record Vote Number: 339. (consideration: CR S11872-11878)
Senate roll call 339 · Individual votesConference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 92 - 7. Record Vote Number: 339.(consideration: CR S11872-11878)
Senate roll call 339 · Individual votesConference report considered in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate. (consideration: CR S11867)
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 379 - 33 (Roll no. 436).
House roll call 436 · Individual votesMotions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 379 - 33 (Roll no. 436).
House roll call 436 · Individual votesThe House proceeded to consider the conference report H.Rept. 107-275 as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8087)
POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the coference report, the Chair announced that pursuant to the rule, the Yeas and Nays were ordered. The Chair subsequently postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the conference report until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Bonilla brought up conference report H. Rept. 107-275 by previously agreed to special order. (consideration: CR H8067-8081)
Conference report H. Rept. 107-275 filed. (text of conference report: CR H7962-7986)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 107-275 filed.(text of conference report: CR H7962-7986)
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Mr. Bonilla asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on Nov. 9 to file a conference report on H.R. 2330. Agreed to without objection.
The Speaker appointed conferees: Bonilla, Walsh, Kingston, Nethercutt, Latham, Emerson, Goode, LaHood, Young (FL), Kaptur, DeLauro, Hinchey, Farr, Boyd, and Obey.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by voice vote.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to instruct conferees. The instructions contained in the motion require the managers on the part of the House to insist on providing the highest level of funding possible for international food activities under Public Law 480, Title II.
Ms. Kaptur moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H7549-7553)
Mr. Bonilla asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Measure amended in Senate after passage by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11247)
Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Kohl, Harkin, Dorgan, Feinstein, Durbin, Johnson, Murray, Byrd, Cochran, Specter, Bond, McConnell, Burns, Craig and Stevens.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 91 - 5. Record Vote Number: 315. (text as passed Senate: CR 10/30/2001 S11236-11247)
Senate roll call 315 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 91 - 5. Record Vote Number: 315.(text as passed Senate: CR 10/30/2001 S11236-11247)
Senate roll call 315 · Individual votesMeasure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S10060-11075, S11076-11095)
Senate Committee on Appropriations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Appropriations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 414 - 16 (Roll no. 221).
House roll call 221 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 414 - 16 (Roll no. 221).
House roll call 221 · Individual votesThe House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2330.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 60 minutes of debate on the Olver amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Allen amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
POSTPONED VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Royce amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Royce demanded a recorded vote based upon the absence of a quorum and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, further proceedings on the question were postponed until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Royce amendment.
POSTPONED VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Weiner amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Weiner demanded a recorded vote based upon the absence of a quorum and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, further proceedings on the question were postponed until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Weiner amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Stupak amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (MI) amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (MI) amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Traficant amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Blumenauer amendment.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Baca amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Clayton amendment.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote based upon the absence of a quorum and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, further proceedings on the question were postponed until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Kucinich amendment.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Gutknecht amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Gutknecht demanded a recorded vote based upon the absence of a quorum and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, further proceedings on the question were postponed until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Gutknecht amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mink amendments.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Sanders amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Bonilla demanded a recorded vote based upon the absence of a quorum and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, further proceedings on the question were postponed until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the Sanders amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Hinchey amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pelosi amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3874-3927)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2330 as unfinished business.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption on amendments debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Clayton amendment under the five-minute rule.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Bonilla submitted a unanimous consent request detailing the list of amendments which would be offered in the further consideration of H.R. 2330 in the Committee of the Whole. The request was agreed to without objection.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2330 as unfinished business.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Engel amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Engel demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Engel amendment.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Brown (OH) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Brown (OH) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Davis (CA) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tierney amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kaptur amendment under the five-minute rule.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2330.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Bob Goodlatte to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 183 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2330 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 183. (consideration: CR H3744-3787; text of Title I as reported in House: CR H3761, H3763, H3764-3765, H3767, H3769-3770, H3772-3773; text of Title II as reported in House: CR H3773; text of Title III as reported in House: CR H3773-3775; text of Title IV as reported in House: CR H3775-3777; text of Title V as reported in House: CR H3777; text of Title VI as reported in House: CR H3777)
Rule H. Res. 183 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 183 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2330 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-116, by Mr. Bonilla.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-116, by Mr. Bonilla.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2330 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2330 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2330 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2330 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.