PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2316 / 104th Congress

Exempt Organization Reform Act of 1995

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 12, 1995

Exempt Organization Reform Act of 1995 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to impose an excess benefit transactions excise tax on a disqualified person and on an organization manager. Defines excess benefit transaction as any transaction in which an economic benefit is provided by a tax-exempt organization to or for the use of a disqualified person, if the value of the benefit exceeds the value of the consideration. Defines disqualified person and organization manager. Requires 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations to report certain excise taxes paid. Revises requirements concerning the public inspection of the returns of exempt organizations. Requires certain organizations to disclose, in a conspicuous and easily recognizable format, in an advertisement or solicitation the nonexempt status of such organization. Provides for a penalty, not to exceed $10,000, of $1,000 for each day on which a failure occurred to disclose such nonexempt status with respect to any advertisement or solicitation. Provides for an increase in penalties on exempt organizations for failure to file complete and timely annual returns. Provides for a larger penalty for exempt organizations having gross receipts exceeding $1,000,000 for any year.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13] · D–CA

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1765-1766)

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2316 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2316 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2316 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2316 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources