PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-180.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 25, 2001
Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Restructuring Act of 2001 - Requires the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (D.C.), the Director of the D.C. Pretrial Services Agency, the U.S. Attorney for D.C., the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, and the Chair of the U.S. Parole Commission to serve on the D.C. Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.Establishes an annual reporting requirement for the Council.Authorizes appropriations for FY 2002 and thereafter for a Federal contribution to D.C. to cover the costs incurred by the Council in carrying out its duties.
People & committees
Rep. Morella, Constance A. [R-MD-8] · R–MD
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-180.
Became Public Law No: 107-180.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3976)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S3976)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 107-145.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 107-145.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring and the District of Columbia.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8811)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8811)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2305.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8811-8813)
Mrs. Morella moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on District of Columbia.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2305 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2305 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2305 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2305 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.