Referred to the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 27, 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Assistance to Workers Subject to Plant Closings or Mass Layoffs Because their Work is Transferred to Low Wage Foreign Countries Title II: Amendments to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act Title III: Effective Date American Jobs Protection Act - Title I: Assistance to Workers Subject to Plant Closings or Mass Layoffs Because Their Work Is Transferred to Low Wage Foreign Countries - Requires employers to provide specified notice and employee benefits (including severance pay, continuation of health care benefits, reimbursement for retraining, training incentive payments, and accelerated eligibility for early retirement) to employees who are subject to a plant closing or mass layoff because their work is transferred to (or similar products are imported from) another country which has specified levels of lower wages or less effective employment standards for overtime compensation, child labor, and employee safety. Prohibits employers who do not provide such notice and benefits from entering into a contract with the United States for provision of products or services involved in the work transfer or substantially similar to such products or services. Provides for enforcement of this title by: (1) investigative and administrative actions and actions for injunctions by the Secretary of Labor; and (2) civil actions by employees, local governments, States, and the Secretary. Requires employers to post notice concerning this title and the filing of a charge. Authorizes civil fines for violations. Title II: Amendments to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act - Amends the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to lower the number of employees an employer must have to be covered by such Act to 50 (currently 100) and the number involved to be considered a plant closing or mass layoff to 25 (currently 50 for a closing and various formulas for a layoff). Reduces the aggregate number of weekly hours of such employees by half to reflect such change. Increases the time period of notice required before plant closings and mass layoffs to 180 days. Adds to the damages for which an employer in violation of such Act is liable. Excludes liability for liquidated damages if the violation is a good faith act or omission. Adds required enforcement actions by the Secretary of Labor. Requires (currently allows) the prevailing party in a civil action against an employer under such Act to receive a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs. Requires employers to post notice concerning such Act and the filing of a charge. Authorizes civil fines for violations. Title III: Effective Date - Sets forth the effective date of this Act and the amendments it makes.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2300 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2300 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2300 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2300 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.