PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Aviation Prior to Introduction (June 12, 97).
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 29, 1997
Amends Federal aviation law to require the Secretary of Transportation, subject to the President's approval, to limit or deny the operating rights of a foreign carrier to carry cargo in all-cargo configured aircraft between the United States and a third country when it is determined that: (1) the government, an aeronautical authority, or a foreign air carrier has limited or denied, in violation of an air services agreement between the United States and the foreign country, the operating rights of an air carrier to carry cargo in all-cargo configured aircraft between the foreign country and the third country; and (2) limiting or denying such operating rights is consistent with the public interest and the international aviation policy of the United States.
People & committees
Rep. Shuster, Bud [R-PA-9] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Aviation Prior to Introduction (June 12, 97).
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2282 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2282 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2282 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2282 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.