PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2266 / 105th Congress

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1998

For actions pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act (P.L. 104-130), see House Document 105-155. (consideration: CR H8843)

Official summary

Version 51 · Line item veto by President · Oct 14, 1997

(On June 25, 1998, the Supreme Court ruled that the Line Item Veto Act (Public Law 104-130) is unconstitutional, thus restoring provisions that had been cancelled as summarized below.) (On October 14, 1997, the President exercised his line item veto authority to cancel $144 million in discretionary budget authority for 13 projects in this Act, including one Air Force operation and maintenance and procurement project, four Army research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) projects, two Navy RDT&E projects, three Air Force RDT&E projects, and three Defense-wide RDT&E projects. The following summary reflects the enacted version of H.R. 2266 as modified by the line item veto cancellations. (Note: The high degree of specificity of the items cancelled precluded their inclusion in the original law's summary. As a result, the original law's summary and the summary of the law after the item vetoes are identical. For more information on the specific items vetoed, see the text of the conference report for H.R. 2266, H.Rept. 105-265, and Presidential Cancellation Numbers 97-42 through 97-55.)) TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Military Personnel Title II: Operation and Maintenance Title III: Procurement Title IV: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Title V: Revolving and Management Funds Title VI: Other Department of Defense Programs Title VII: Related Agencies Title VIII: General Provisions Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1998 - Title I: Military Personnel - Appropriates funds for FY 1998 for active-duty and reserve personnel in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force and for National Guard personnel in the Army and Air Force. Title II: Operation and Maintenance - Appropriates funds for FY 1998 for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the Army, Navy, and Air Force (including a transfer of funds in each case), the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, the reserve components, and the Army and Air National Guards. Appropriates funds for: (1) overseas contingency operations (including a transfer of funds); (2) the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; (3) environmental restoration for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and defense-wide (including a transfer of funds in each case); (4) environmental restoration at former defense sites (including a transfer of funds); (5) overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid; (6) nuclear threat reduction programs with respect to republics of the former Soviet Union; and (7) quality of life enhancements, defense. Title III: Procurement - Appropriates funds for FY 1998 for procurement by the armed forces and its reserve components of aircraft, missiles, weapons, tracked combat vehicles, ammunition, shipbuilding and conversion, and for other procurement. Appropriates funds for defense-wide procurement and for National Guard and reserve equipment. Title IV: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation - Appropriates funds for FY 1998 for research, development, test and evaluation by the armed forces and defense agencies. Earmarks: (1) Navy V-22 funds to meet unique requirements of the Special Operations Forces; and (2) specified defense-wide funds for the Sea-Based Wide Area Defense (Navy Upper-Tier) program. Appropriates funds for the Directors of Test and Evaluation and Operational Test and Evaluation. Title V: Revolving and Management Funds - Appropriates funds for: (1) the defense working capital funds; and (2) programs under the National Defense Sealift Fund. Title VI: Other Department of Defense Programs - Appropriates funds for: (1) the Department of Defense (DOD) medical and health care programs; (2) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions; (3) drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense (including a transfer of funds); and (4) expenses and activities of the Office of the Inspector General in carrying out the Inspector General Act of 1978. Title VII: Related Agencies - Appropriates funds for: (1) the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund; (2) expenses of the Intelligence Community Management Account (including a transfer of funds); (3) authorized payments to the Kaho'olawe Island Conveyance, Remediation, and Environmental Restoration Trust Fund; and (4) national security scholarships, fellowships, and grants (using funds derived from the National Security Education Trust Fund). Title VIII: General Provisions - Specifies authorized, restricted, and prohibited uses of appropriated funds. (Sec. 8008) Authorizes procurement funds appropriated under this Act to be used for multiyear procurement contracts for the Apache Longbow radar, AV-8B aircraft, and Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles. (Sec. 8010) Prohibits during FY 1998 the management by end strengths of DOD civilian personnel. (Sec. 8019) Authorizes the Secretary of Defense (Secretary) to establish with host governments of NATO-member countries an account for the deposit of residual value amounts negotiated in the return of U.S. military installations to such countries. (Sec. 8033) Authorizes DOD to incur up to $350 million in obligations for DOD personnel compensation, military construction projects, and supplies and services in anticipation of receipts of contributions from the government of Kuwait. (Sec. 8034) Earmarks funds from this Act for the Civil Air Patrol. (Sec. 8035) Prohibits the use of funds from this Act to establish a new DOD federally funded research and development center (FFRDC). Limits the Federal compensation to be paid to DOD FFRDC members or consultants. Prohibits the use of FY 1998 DOD FFRDC funds for charitable contributions, new building construction, cost-sharing payments for projects funded by Government grants, or absorption of cost overruns. Limits the staff years of technical effort that may be funded for DOD FFRDCs from FY 1998 funds. Directs the Secretary to report to the defense committees concerning such staff year allocations. (Sec. 8041) Reduces by $300 million the total amounts appropriated in titles I through IV of this Act to reflect savings from the DOD use of advisory and assistance services. (Sec. 8043) Reduces by 1.5 percent the amounts provided in all appropriation accounts in titles III and IV of this Act. Requires the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) to report to the defense committees on the specific funding reductions allocated to each appropriation category. Reduces by $474 million the total amount appropriated in title IV, requiring an allocation report from the Undersecretary. (Sec. 8046) Directs the President to include within each fiscal year budget the amounts requested for administrative activities of DOD, the military departments, and the defense agencies. (Sec. 8053) Prohibits the use of funds: (1) for the modification of an aircraft, weapon, ship, or other equipment that the military department concerned plans to retire or otherwise dispose of within five years after completion of the modification; (2) to transport chemical munitions to the Johnston Atoll for storage or demilitarization (with an exception and an authorized wartime waiver by the President); (3) by a DOD entity without compliance with the Buy American Act; (4) for assistance to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea unless specifically appropriated for such purpose; and (5) to reduce the civilian medical and medical support personnel assigned to military treatment facilities below the September 30, 1996 level. (Sec. 8056) Earmarks funds appropriated under this Act for the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts on Indian lands resulting from DOD activities. (Sec. 8063) Authorizes DOD to lease real and personal property at the Adak Naval Air Facility, Alaska. (Sec. 8064) Rescinds specified funds from various accounts under prior defense appropriations Acts. (Sec. 8078) Directs the Army, during the current fiscal year, to use the former George Air Force Base as the airhead for the National Training Center at Fort Irwin (California). (Sec. 8079) Directs the Secretary to report quarterly to specified congressional committees setting forth all costs incurred by DOD in implementing or supporting United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions. (Sec. 8080) Prohibits FY 1997 DOD funds from being obligated or expended to transfer to another nation or international organization defense articles or services for use in any UN peacekeeping or peace enforcement operation, or for any other international peacekeeping, peace enforcement, or humanitarian assistance operation, unless specified congressional committees are given 15 days' advance notice. (Sec. 8081) Directs the Secretary, to the extent authorized by law, to issue loan guarantees in support of U.S. defense exports not otherwise provided for, with a contingent liability limit of $15 billion. Requires quarterly reports to specified congressional committees on such loan guarantees. (Sec. 8088) Provides that a specified amount appropriated for Air Force aircraft procurement under a prior-year defense appropriations Act which was obligated for the B-2 aircraft program shall remain available for expenditure until the end of FY 2003. (Sec. 8090) Directs the Secretary, upon the enactment of this Act, to make specified transfers between various DOD appropriation accounts. (Sec. 8091) Directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to report to the defense committees concerning any activity for which the FY 1999 budget request was reduced because the Congress appropriated funds above the President's budget request for that activity for FY 1998. (Sec. 8092) Prohibits DOD funds from being used to reimburse a defense contractor for restructuring costs associated with a business combination unless: (1) certain DOD cost savings are achieved as a result of such restructuring; and (2) a related report required under prior law is submitted to the Congress. Directs the Comptroller General to submit to the Congress an analysis and breakdown of such restructuring costs to DOD. (Sec. 8094) Authorizes the Secretary to waive reimbursement of certain educational costs of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies for military officers and civilian officials of foreign countries if determined to be in the national security interest. (Sec. 8097) Authorizes appropriations to the Navy for a grant for the refurbishment of the former U.S.S. Intrepid. (Sec. 8100) Authorizes appropriations for the O&M of Fisher houses. (Sec. 8104) Requires DOD to submit to the defense committees a budget justification for the active and reserve military personnel accounts. (Sec. 8105) Reduces by $100 million the total amount appropriated under this Act, to be derived from the various military O&M accounts. (Sec. 8106) Reduces by $75 million the total amount appropriated under title III to reflect savings achieved as the result of the repeal of a Federal provision requiring certain contractor guarantees with respect to major weapon systems. (Sec. 8107) Authorizes the Secretary of the Army to exchange or sell one Army C-20 aircraft and apply the proceeds to the acquisition of one C-37 aircraft. (Sec. 8109) Earmarks funds from this Act to assist a pilot project that will facilitate the transfer of commercial cruise ship shipbuilding technology and expertise to U.S. shipbuilding yards, utilize the experience and expertise of existing U.S.-flag cruise ship operators, and enable the operation of one U.S.-flag foreign-built cruise ship and two newly-constructed U.S.-flag cruise tooling to construct, or for the construction of, such vessels. (Sec. 8110) Directs the Secretary to submit to the: (1) defense committees an aviation safety plan concerning navigational safety upgrades for all DOD aircraft; and (2) appropriations committees a report on alternatives for current theater combat simulations. (Sec. 8113) Amends the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1997 to require, as of June 30, 1998, that each DOD disbursement in excess of $1 million (currently $3 million) be matched to a particular obligation before the disbursement is made. (Sec. 8115) Expresses the sense of the Congress that all NATO member nations should contribute a proportionate share of the costs of the Partnership for Peace program and for any future costs attributable to NATO expansion. Requires each annual budget for FY 1999 and thereafter to separately identify all DOD costs incurred to support such expansion. (Sec. 8117) Prohibits funds from this Act from being used to: (1) enter into or renew a contract with a contractor who has not submitted to the Labor Department its most recently required annual report concerning the employment of veterans; (2) approve or license the sale of the F-22 advanced tactical fighter to any foreign government; or (3) fund the United States Man and the Biosphere Program or related projects. (Sec. 8120) Earmarks specified DOD funds for the payment of claims for loss or damage to personal property suffered by military personnel residing in the vicinity of Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, as a direct result of flooding in the Red River Basin during April and May of 1997. (Sec. 8121) Earmarks specified Navy funds for a program to demonstrate the expanded use of multitechnology automated reader cards throughout the Navy and Marine Corps. (Sec. 8122) Directs the Secretary to report to the defense committees concerning U.S. costs for the admission of the Czech Republic, Poland, and Hungary to NATO for FY 1998 through 2002, as well as any U.S. commitments for the admission of other new members. (Sec. 8123) Authorizes the Secretary to waive limitations concerning procurements from a foreign country if: (1) they would invalidate either cooperative agreements entered into between DOD and the foreign country or arrangements for the reciprocal procurement of defense items; and (2) the country does not discriminate against the same or similar defense items produced in the United States for that country. (Sec. 8124) Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Senate ratify NATO enlargement, that the proportional U.S. share of the NATO common budget should not increase, and that if any NATO member nation does not pay its share, the United States shall not pay either. (Sec. 8125) Finds that the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission directed the transfer of only ten electro-magnetic test environment systems from Eglin Air Force Base, Florida to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. (Sec. 8126) Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) the Secretary should ensure that printing costs of DOD and the military services are held to the lowest amount possible; (2) DOD should strictly comply with the Printing and Binding Regulations; and (3) the DOD budget submission for FY 1999 should reflect the savings that will result from such stricter printing guidelines. (Sec. 8127) Rescinds specified funds under prior defense appropriations Acts, with conditions and a required report from the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) on the programs, projects, and activities proposed for rescission. (Sec. 8129) Authorizes the Secretary to enter into a contract during FY 1998 for the procurement of four submarines under the New Attack Submarine Program. Requires a teaming of contractor performance between the Electric Boat Corporation and the Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company. (Sec. 8130) Appropriates funds for defense-wide O&M to be used only for the establishment of the 21st Century National Security Study Group after the completion and implementation of a memorandum of agreement concerning the study's scope. Requires such memorandum to be completed by December 15, 1997. (Sec. 8131) Establishes an independent panel to evaluate and report to the President and the Congress on the adequacy of current planning for U.S. long-range air power and the requirement for continued low-rate production of B-2 stealth bombers. (Sec. 8132) Prohibits funds appropriated in this Act from being made available for the deployment of U.S. troops in Bosnia and Herzegovina after June 30, 1998, unless the President certifies to the Congress that the continued presence of such troops is required in order to meet U.S. national security interests.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL

Committees

  • Appropriations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. For actions pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act (P.L. 104-130), see House Document 105-155. (consideration: CR H8843)

    2. Line item veto by President

    3. The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.

    4. Became Public Law No: 105-56.

    5. Became Public Law No: 105-56.

    6. Signed by President.

    7. Signed by President.

    8. Presented to President.

    9. Presented to President.

    10. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    11. Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 93-5. Record Vote No: 258. (consideration: CR S9957)

      Senate roll call 258 · Individual votes
    12. Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 93-5. Record Vote No: 258.(consideration: CR S9957)

      Senate roll call 258 · Individual votes
    13. Conference report considered in Senate.

    14. Conference papers: message on House action held at the desk in Senate.

    15. On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 356 - 65 (Roll no. 442). (consideration: CR H7842-7849)

      House roll call 442 · Individual votes
    16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    17. Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 356 - 65 (Roll no. 442).(consideration: CR H7842-7849)

      House roll call 442 · Individual votes
    18. The previous question was ordered without objection.

    19. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 242, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.

    20. Mr. Young (FL) brought up conference report H. Rept. 105-265 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 242.

    21. Rule H. Res. 242 passed House.

    22. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 242 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 2266. The resolution waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration. The conference report shall be considered as read when called up.

    23. Conference report H. Rept. 105-265 filed. (text of conference report: CR H7656-7710)

    24. Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 105-265 filed.(text of conference report: CR H7656-7710)

    25. Conferees agreed to file conference report.

    26. Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

    27. Conference held.

    28. Conference committee actions: Conference held.

    29. Conference held.

    30. Conference committee actions: Conference held.

    31. On motion to close portions of the conference relating to matters of national security Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 420 - 4 (Roll no. 354). (consideration: CR H6761)

      House roll call 354 · Individual votes
    32. Mr. Young (FL) moved to close portions of the conference relating to matters of national security to the public.

    33. The Speaker appointed conferees: Young (FL), McDade, Lewis (CA), Skeen, Hobson, Bonilla, Nethercutt, Istook, Cunningham, Livingston, Murtha, Dicks, Hefner, Sabo, Dixon, Visclosky, and Obey.

    34. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    35. On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H6761)

    36. The previous question was ordered without objection.

    37. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to instruct conferees on the part of the House to insist on the House position prohibiting the use of funds to approve or license the sale of the F-22 advanced tactical fighter to any foreign govenment.

    38. Mr. Obey moved that the House instruct conferees.

    39. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    40. On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.

    41. Mr. Young (FL) asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference. (consideration: CR H6760)

    42. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    43. Senate insists on its amendment asks for a conference, appoints conferees Stevens; Cochran; Specter; Domenici; Bond; McConnell; Shelby; Gregg; Hutchison; Inouye; Hollings; Byrd; Leahy; Bumpers; Lautenberg; Harkin; Dorgan. (consideration: CR S8248-8249)

    44. Passed Senate in lieu of S. 1005 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

    45. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 1005 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

    46. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 1005 amended.

    47. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.

    48. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    49. The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 2266.

    50. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    51. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 322 - 105 (Roll no. 338).

      House roll call 338 · Individual votes
    52. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 322 - 105 (Roll no. 338).

      House roll call 338 · Individual votes
    53. The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

    54. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    55. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2266.

    56. Mr. Young (FL) asked unanimous consent that the time for debate on the Nadler amendment, and all amendments thereto, be limited to 30 minutes. Agreed to without objection.

    57. At the conclusion of debate, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the Obey amendment and announce that, by voice vote, the amendment was not agreed to. Mr. Obey objected to the vote on grounds that a quorum was not present and made a point of order that a quorum was not present. Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 198, further proceedings were postponed and the point of order was withdrawn.

    58. DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Obey amendment.

    59. Mr. Young (FL) asked unanimous consent that the time for debate on the Obey amendment be limited to 20 minutes, equally divided. Agreed to without objection.

    60. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.

    61. The Speaker designated the Honorable Dave Camp to act as Chairman of the Committee.

    62. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 198 and Rule XXIII.

    63. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2266 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.

    64. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 198. (consideration: CR S8248-8249)

    65. Rule H. Res. 198 passed House.

    66. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 198 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2266 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.

    67. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 127.

    68. The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 105-206, by Mr. Young (FL).

    69. The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 105-206, by Mr. Young (FL).

    70. Introduced in House

    71. Ordered to be Reported.

    72. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    73. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.

    74. Final Day of Subcommittee Mark-Up.

    75. First Day of Subcommittee Mark-Up.

    76. Final Day of Subcommittee Hearings.

    77. First Day of Subcommittee Hearings.

    78. Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.

    79. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Security.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2266 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2266 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2266 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2266 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources