Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 24, 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Supplemental Appropriations Title II: Rescissions Title III: General Provisions Second Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1993 - Title I: Supplemental Appropriations - Makes supplemental appropriations available to: (1) the Employment and Training Administration of the Department of Labor; (2) the Environmental Protection Agency for construction grants; (3) the Farmers Home Administration of the Department of Agriculture; (4) the Office of Justice Programs of the Department of Justice; (5) the Federal Railroad Administration of the Department of Transportation; and (6) the Small Business Administration through a fund transfer. Title II: Rescissions - Rescinds specified appropriations made to: (1) the Department of Agriculture for the Farmers Home Administration; (2) the Department of Commerce for the Economic Development Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; (3) the Department of Justice for Office of Justice Programs and the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission; (4) the Department of the Interior for the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, and the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation; (5) the Department of Labor for the Employment and Training Administration and departmental management; (6) the Department of Education for certain programs; (7) the Department of Transportation for the Coast Guard, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; (8) the Department of the Treasury for the U.S. Customs Administration, the Bureau of the Public Debt, and the Internal Revenue Service; (9) the General Services Administration for the Federal Buildings Fund; (10) the Department of Veterans Affairs for departmental administration; (11) the Department of Housing and Urban Development for certain housing programs; (12) the Environmental Protection Agency for the Hazardous Substance Superfund; and (13) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for research and development. Title III: General Provisions - Prohibits appropriations in this Act from remaining available for obligation beyond the current fiscal year unless expressly so provided. Restricts the availability of funds for the Community Investment Program until September 30, 1993. Prohibits the use of any funds to pay for the relocation of the Human Nutrition Information Service.
Pursuant to H. Res. 183, the sundry amendments adopted by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union are deemed to have been adopted in the House.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2244.
LIMITATION OF DEBATE TIME - Mr. Natcher asked unanimous consent that debate on all amendments offered to the bill for the remainder of the evening be limited to not to exceed twenty minutes, equally divided and controlled, except for the amendment to be offered by Mr. Kolbe which will be debated for not to exceed thirty minutes, equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
LIMITATION ON TIME FOR DEBATE - Mr. Natcher asked unanimous consent that the time for debate on the Burton amendment, and all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed ten minutes, equally divided and controlled by Mr. Burton and Ms. Waters. Agreed to without objection.
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 183, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jim McDermott to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 183 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2118 and H.R. 2244 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Upon adoption of this resolution the Speaker may declare the House in the Committee of the Whole for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2244) and all points against consideration shall be waived. All points of order against the bill H.R. 2118 shall be waived. Bill is open to amendments. The amendments printed in the report accompanying this resolution relating to H.R. 2244 shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole, and the bill as amended shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment printed in section two of this resolution relating to H.R. 2118 shall be considered as adopted in the House
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 183. (consideration: CR H2881-2916)
Rule H. Res. 183 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 183 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2118 and H.R. 2244 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Upon adoption of this resolution the Speaker may declare the House in the Committee of the Whole for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2244) and all points against consideration shall be waved. All points of order against the bill H.R. 2118 shall be waived. Bill is open to amendments. The amendments printed in in the report accompanying this resolution relating to H.R. 2244 shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole, and the bill as amended shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment printed in section two of this resolution relating to H.R. 2118 shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the W...
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 54.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-105, by Mr. Natcher.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-105, by Mr. Natcher.
Mr. Natcher asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Appropriations have until midnight on May 24 to file a report on H.R. 2244, making a Supplemental Approprtions for FY 1993. Agreed to without objection.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2244 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2244 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2244 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2244 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.