PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 19, 2001
2001 Supplemental Appropriations Act - Makes supplemental appropriations (with some offsetting rescissions) for FY 2001 for: (1) the Department of Defense (DOD) for military personnel, operation and maintenance (including funds for repair of the U.S.S Cole and for facilities repair and damages resulting from natural disasters), procurement, research, development, test and evaluation, revolving and management funds, the Defense Health Program, drug interdiction and counter-drug activities; (2) the Department of Energy (DOE) for certain defense-related activities; (3) military construction and family housing, and base realignment and closure; (4) the District of Columbia for various programs and authorities; (5) DOD for certain activities of the Army Corps of Engineers; (6) DOE for certain energy programs and power marketing administrations; (7) the Department of the Interior for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service; (8) the Department of Agriculture for State and private forestry, the National Forest System, wildland fire management, and capital improvement and maintenance, (9) the Department of Health and Human Services for low income home energy assistance; (10) the Department of Education for education for the disadvantaged and for educational research, statistics, and improvement; (11) the Legislative Branch for certain salaries and expenses, the Government Printing Office, and the Library of Congress; (12) the Department of Transportation for the Coast Guard; (13) the Department of the Treasury for the Financial Management Service and the Internal Revenue Service; (14) the Department of Veterans Affairs for the Veterans Benefits Administration; (15) the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund and the Federal Housing Administration; and (16) the Environmental Protection Agency.
People & committees
Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-20.
Became Public Law No: 107-20.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to conference report by Unanimous Consent.
Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Unanimous Consent.
Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S8004-8008)
Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 30 (Roll no. 256).
House roll call 256 · Individual votesMotions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 30 (Roll no. 256).
House roll call 256 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 60 minutes of debate on the conference report to accompany H.R. 2216.
Mr. Young (FL) brought up conference report H. Rept. 107-148 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 204. (consideration: CR H4356-4367)
Rule H. Res. 204 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 204 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 2216 with 1 hour of general debate. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference report H. Rept. 107-148 filed. (text of conference report: CR H4281-4303)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 107-148 filed.(text of conference report: CR H4281-4303)
The Speaker appointed conferees: Young (FL), Regula, Lewis (CA), Rogers (KY), Skeen, Wolf, Kolbe, Callahan, Walsh, Taylor (NC), Hobson, Istook, Bonilla, Knollenberg, Obey, Murtha, Dicks, Sabo, Hoyer, Mollohan, Kaptur, Visclosky, Lowey, Serrano, and Olver.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 205 - 219 (Roll no. 225).
House roll call 225 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Obey motion to instruct managers on the part of the House at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the Senate amendment to the bill be instructed (1) to insist that no provision to rescind FEMA Disaster Relief Fund be included in the conference report; (2) to agree to the Senate provision that appropriates an additional $35 million for the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service for projects related to "mad cow disease" and "hoof and mouth disease," and (3) to agree to the Senate provision that appropriates an additional $84 million for claims covered by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.
Mr. Obey moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 423 - 3 (Roll no. 224). (consideration: CR H3967-3979)
House roll call 224 · Individual votesThe House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
See also S. 1077.
Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Byrd, Inouye, Hollings, Stevens and Cochran.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 98 - 1. Record Vote Number: 228. (text: CR 7/11/2001 S7527-5734)
Senate roll call 228 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 98 - 1. Record Vote Number: 228.(text: CR 7/11/2001 S7527-5734)
Senate roll call 228 · Individual votesSenate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S.1077 amended. (consideration: CR S7417)
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 77.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 341 - 87 (Roll no. 176).
House roll call 176 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 341 - 87 (Roll no. 176).
House roll call 176 · Individual votesOn motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 209 - 218 (Roll no. 175).
House roll call 175 · Individual votesThe previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Obey motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion direct the Committee on Appropriations to report the bill back promptly with amendments to strike the rescission of $389,200,000 from the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund while complying with all applicable budget constraints.
Mr. Obey moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations. (text: CR H3346)
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2216.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - The Chair announced that proceedings would resume on amendments debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Baird amendment undert the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Commitee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Bentsen amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Toomey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Toomey demanded a recorded vote pending the absence of a quorum and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Toomey amendment.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Engel amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
POSTPONED VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Obey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the Noes had prevailed. Mr. Frank (MA) demanded a recorded vote pending the absence of a quorum and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Obey amendment.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Crowley amendment under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sanders amendment under the five-minute rule pending the reservation of a point of order.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that debate be limited on the following amendments when called up for consideration: an amendment offered by Mr. Toomey for 20 minutes; and an amendment offered by Mr. Obey for 30 minutes. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the DeLauro amendment, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Visclosky amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Filner amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Knollenberg amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Farr amendment, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Pelosi amendment, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Skelton amendment, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the DeFazio amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the Noes had prevailed. Mr. DeFazio demanded a recorded vote pending the absence of a quorum and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeFazio amendment under the five-minute rule.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Young of Florida asked unanimous consent that debate on the following amendments proceed within the time constraints noted, notwithstanding points of order which will lie against said amendments: An amendment offered by Ms. Pelosi for 30 minutes; an amendment offered by Mr. Farr for 20 minutes; an amendment offered by Ms. DeLauro for 20 minutes; an amendment offered by Mr. Visclosky for 20 minutes; an amendment offered by Mr. Bentsen for 20 minutes; and an amendment offered by Mr. Skelton for 20 minutes. Agreed to without objection.
FIVE-MINUTE RULE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with reading the bill for amendment under the five-minute rule.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2216.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Doug Bereuter to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 171 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2216 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Waives all points of order against the bill. The amendment printed in Part A of H.Rept. 107-105 shall be considered as adopted. Makes in order the amendment printed in Part B of H. Rept. 107-105 and waives all points of order against the amendment. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. Authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognitions to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 171. (consideration: CR H3291-3348)
Rule H. Res. 171 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 171 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2216 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Waives all points of order against the bill. The amendment printed in Part A of H.Rept. 107-105 shall be considered as adopted. Makes in order the amendment printed in Part B of H. Rept. 107-105 and waives all points of order against the amendment. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. Authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognitions to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 55.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-102, by Mr. Young (FL).
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-102, by Mr. Young (FL).
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2216 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2216 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2216 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2216 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.