PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2205 / 114th Congress

Data Security Act of 2015

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 114-867, Part I.

Official summary

Version 18 · Reported to House amended, Part I · Dec 12, 2016

Data Security Act of 2015

(Sec. 4) This bill requires individuals, corporations, or other non-government entities that access, maintain, communicate, or handle sensitive financial account information or nonpublic personal information to: (1) implement an information security program to protect the security and confidentiality of such information against anticipated threats, hazards, or unauthorized acquisitions; and (2) notify consumers, state and federal law enforcement, appropriate administrative agencies, payment card networks, and consumer reporting agencies of certain data breaches of sensitive information that is not encrypted, redacted, or protected and is likely to cause harm to the consumers.

The types of sensitive information subject to this bill include:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

consumer financial account numbers (including credit or debit card numbers) in combination with security codes, passwords, or personal identification information required to access an account;

non-truncated Social Security numbers;

the first name or initial and last name of a consumer in combination with numbers issued on government documents used to verify identity (e.g., driver's license, passport, or military identification numbers), usernames and passwords for email or consumer accounts, or consumer biometric data used to gain access to financial accounts; and

medical and health insurance information.

The requirements of this bill do not apply to information lawfully made available to the general public that is obtained from government records or widely distributed media. The entities subject to this bill must: (1) designate employees to coordinate their information security programs; (2) identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks; (3) assess, design, and implement safeguards; (4) oversee their third-party service providers; and (5) adjust security in light of risk assessments, testing, changes to operations or business arrangements, or other circumstances that may impact the security program. Entities must require their third-party service providers by contract to implement appropriate safeguards and assess compliance with such contractual obligations.

If appropriate, entities must adopt:

access controls and authentication procedures for information systems;

access restrictions at physical locations;

encryption of electronic information;

procedures to ensure that any information system modifications are consistent with security programs;

dual control procedures, segregation of duties, and criminal background checks for employees with access to sensitive information;

monitoring systems to detect intrusions;

response programs that specify actions to be taken when an entity suspects or detects unauthorized access; and

measures to protect against destruction of information due to fire, water damage, or technological failures.

If an entity has a board of directors: (1) the board must direct the entity to have a written information security program in place and appoint personnel to oversee the program, and (2) an annual report shall be made to the board describing the status and implementation of the entity's security program.

Entities must investigate data breaches they believe may have occurred in relation to the sensitive information they handle or that is handled on their behalf. If an entity determines that an unauthorized acquisition is reasonably likely to harm consumers, the entity must notify within the most expedient time possible:

federal and state law enforcement;

the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the appropriate federal or state administrative enforcement agency designated to enforce this bill with respect to banks or other financial institutions;

payment card networks, if the breach involves card numbers;

consumer reporting agencies, if the breach involves 5,000 or more consumers; and

all consumers to whom the sensitive information relates.

An entity's notice to consumers about a breach must be provided by telephone, email, or written notification to a postal address. An entity may use a substitute notification method in print and to broadcast media if telephonic, email, or written notification is infeasible because of: (1) insufficient contact information, (2) costs exceeding $250,000, (3) the number of consumers exceeding 500,000, or (4) exigent circumstances.

Notifications may be delayed at the request of a law enforcement agency.

Third-party service providers contracted to maintain, store, or process data in electronic form on behalf of another entity must provide notice regarding a breach to: (1) such entity, and (2) consumers if so provided under the contract.

Certain electronic data carriers that provide only transmission, routing, transient storage, or network connection services must notify entities that initiate connections or transmissions that become involved in a breach involving sensitive information if: (1) the carrier becomes aware of the breach, and (2) the entity that owns or licenses the information can be reasonably identified. The entity that initiated the connection must then provide the required notices under this bill.

Financial institutions may communicate with account holders regarding breaches at other entities with access to their account information.

The bill provides alternative compliance procedures for: (1) financial institutions and affiliates under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and (2) entities complying with certain health record privacy laws under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act or regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

(Sec. 5) The bill designates the federal or state administrative enforcement agencies responsible for enforcing compliance with this bill by banks, financial institutions, or entities that are not financial institutions. Depending on the type of entity, the enforcement must be conducted by the FTC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, state insurance regulators, the state of domicile, or state securities commissioners.

Cable operators, satellite operators, or telecommunications carriers whose information security practices are subject to enforcement under this bill are exempt from certain other information security and breach notification requirements under the Communications Act of 1934 and regulations promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission.

State attorneys general may enforce this bill with respect to entities that are not financial institutions.

(Sec. 6) No state law, regulatory requirement, or prohibition may be imposed with respect to the responsibilities of any person to: (1) protect the security of consumer information, (2) safeguard consumer information from unauthorized access or acquisition, (3) investigate or provide notice of unauthorized acquisition or access, or (4) mitigate any potential or actual loss or harm resulting from unauthorized acquisition or access of consumer information.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Neugebauer, Randy [R-TX-19] · R–TX

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
41 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 114-867, Part I.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 114-867, Part I.

  3. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 9.

  4. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  6. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

  7. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  8. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  9. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  10. Introduced in House

  11. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 11, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2205 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2205 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2205 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2205 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources