PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-113.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 14, 2001
District of Columbia Police Coordination Amendment Act of 2001 - Amends the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal law enforcement agency that the Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia and the U.S. Attorney for the District deem appropriate to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Metropolitan Police Department to assist it in carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement activities in the District.
People & committees
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] · D–DC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-113.
Became Public Law No: 107-113.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 420 - 0 (Roll no. 503). (text as House agree to Senate amendment: CR H10403)
House roll call 503 · Individual votesResolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 420 - 0 (Roll no. 503).(text as House agree to Senate amendment: CR H10403)
House roll call 503 · Individual votesAt the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Ms. Norton objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 2199.
Mrs. Morella moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10403-10404, H10428)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12986-12987)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 246.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 107-103.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 107-103.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring and the District of Columbia.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6012)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H6012)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2199.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6012-6013)
Mrs. Morella moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Unanimous Consent.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on District of Columbia.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1114-1115)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2199 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2199 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2199 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2199 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.