PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2196 / 119th Congress

National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act

Became Public Law No: 119-107.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · Feb 24, 2026

National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act

This bill reauthorizes the National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Foundation to establish in Washington, DC, a monument to commemorate the commitment and service represented by emergency medical services. This authorization expires seven years after enactment of the bill.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9] · R–NC

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 119-107.

  2. Became Public Law No: 119-107.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4551)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  10. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  11. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  12. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  13. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  14. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2523)

  15. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2523)

  16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2196.

  17. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2523-2524)

  18. Mr. Wittman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  19. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 443.

  20. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-518.

  21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-518.

  22. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  24. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged

  25. Subcommittee Hearings Held

  26. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

  27. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  28. Introduced in House

  29. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 28, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2196 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2196 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2196 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2196 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources