Referred to Department of Agriculture for comments.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 10, 1999
James Peak Wilderness Act of 1999 - Amends the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to designate specified lands in the Arapaho National Forest as the James Peak Wilderness. Directs the Secretary of Agriculture: (1) if the Colorado State Land Board informs the Secretary that it is willing to transfer to the United States some or all of the lands owned by the Board within the Wilderness, to promptly seek to reach agreement with the Board regarding terms and conditions for acquisition of such lands; (2) to enter into negotiations with the owner of lands located within the portion of the Jim Creek drainage within the Wilderness for the purpose of acquiring such lands; and (3) to report to specified House and Senate Committees upon the conclusion of an agreement for acquisition of such lands or, after one year after this Act's enactment date, on the status of negotiations. Directs the Forest Supervisor of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests to: (1) establish a trailhead and corresponding facilities and services to regulate use of National Forest System lands adjacent to Alice Township and St. Mary's Glacier; (2) consult with the Clear Creek County Commissioners and residents in the immediate vicinity regarding the location of such facilities and services; and (3) inform specified House and Senate Committees regarding the amount of any additional funding required to implement such measures. Directs the Secretary to remove the abandoned radio tower and associated structures located on Mount Eva on the potential wilderness lands.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2177 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2177 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2177 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2177 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.