PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 6, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Access to Quality Care Subtitle A: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Access to Health Care Professionals Subtitle B: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Access to Health Care Services Subtitle C: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Fair Resolution of Grievances Subtitle D: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Fair Plan Administration Subtitle E: Definitions Title II: Application of Quality Care Standards to Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Under Public Health Service Act Title III: Amendments to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Title IV: Effective Dates; Coordination in Implementation Access to Quality Care Act of 1999 - Title I: Access to Quality Care - Subtitle A: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Access to Health Care Professionals - Requires a health care insurer offering health care coverage through a network of contracted professionals and providers to offer at a reasonable premium an enrollment option for non-network coverage unless such option is otherwise available to enrollees. (Sec. 102) Requires a group health plan and a health insurance issuer to provide for enrollee choice of personal health professional and access to adequate types of care. Subtitle B: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Access to Health Care Services - Requires a group health care plan and a health care insurer to provide for: (1) specialist care; (2) continuity of care; (3) emergency room services; (4) obstetric and gynecological services; and (5) pediatric services. Subtitle C: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Fair Resolution of Grievances - Sets forth internal and external review procedures, including: (1) enrollee notice of adverse coverage determinations; (2) time limits for benefit determinations and internal appeals; (3) physician review of initial coverage determinations; (4) independent medical expert review of initial review determinations, and penalties for denial of such review. Subtitle D: Promoting Quality Care by Ensuring Fair Plan Administration - Prohibits a group health professional or provider plan from offering incentives to reduce or limit medically necessary services with respect to a specific enrollee. (Sec. 133) Sets forth specified enrollee information access requirements, including: (1) plan description, limitations, and benefits; (2) enrollee costs; (3) dispute resolution procedures; (4) network characteristics; (5) care management; (6) inclusion of drugs and biologicals in formularies; (7) preauthorization and utilization review procedures; (8) accreditation status of health insurance issuers and service providers; and (9) performance criteria. (Sec. 138) Requires a group health plan and a health insurance issuer to establish a quality assessment program. Subtitle E: Definitions - Defines specified terms. (Sec. 152) States that nothing in this title shall be construed to preempt State law with respect to health insurance issuers or group health plans. Title II: Application of Quality Care Standards to Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage under Public Health Service Act - Amends the Public Health Service Act to apply quality care provisions under title I of this Act to group health plan and health insurance coverage under such Act. Title III: Amendments to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 - Amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Income Act of 1974 (ERISA) to apply quality care provisions under title I of this Act to group health plan and health insurance coverage under such Act. (Sec. 302) Permits certain actions under State law (rather than under ERISA) involving health insurance enrollees, but stipulates that such actions are not authorized against an employer or other plan sponsor, with specified exceptions. Title IV: Effective Dates; Coordination in Implementation - Sets forth specified effective dates under this Act.
People & committees
Rep. Norwood, Charles W. [R-GA-10] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.216 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.216 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.216 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.216 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.