Guam Excess Lands Act - Directs the Administrator of General Services to transfer specified excess Federal lands to Guam for public benefit, by quitclaim deed and without reimbursement. Makes such lands eligible for transfer upon the enactment and submission to specified congressional committees by Guam of a land use plan. Declares that such property shall not be subject to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act or the requirement set forth in the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1981 that the sale by the Government of Guam of certain property, including property within the Apra Harbor complex, conveyed to it by the Secretary of the Navy shall only be for monetary consideration.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S13087-13088)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S13087-13088)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 496.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-293.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-293.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development. Hearings held.
Referred to Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H55-60)
Mr. de Lugo moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Mr. de Lugo asked unanimous consent that it be in order today for the Speaker to entertain a motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill H.R. 2144. Agreed to without objection.
Favorable Executive Comment Received from Interior.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-391, Part I.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-391, Part I.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Executive Comment Received from GSA.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD, GSA, FAA.
Referred to the Subcommittee On Insular and International Affairs.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Installations and Facilities.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2581-2582)
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Operations.
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2500)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2144 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2144 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2144 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2144 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.