PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2121 / 103rd Congress

Negotiated Rates Act of 1993

Laid on the table. See S. 412 for further action.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Nov 15, 1993

Negotiated Rates Act of 1993 - Amends Federal transportation law to authorize persons against whom a claim is made by a motor carrier of property (other than a household goods carrier), or by a nonhousehold goods freight forwarder for the collection of rates or charges in addition to the rates originally collected by such carrier or freight forwarder, to elect to satisfy such claim pursuant to a specified formula upon showing that the carrier or forwarder is no longer transporting property or is transporting property for the purpose of avoiding application of this Act. Requires that the claimant have been offered a rate other than the one legally on file with the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), have tendered freight in reasonable reliance upon the offered rate, the carrier or forwarder did not properly or timely file a tariff for the rate or failed to execute a valid contract for transportation services, such rate was collected by the carrier or forwarder, and the carrier or forwarder demands additional payment of a higher rate filed in a tariff. (Sec. 2) Sets forth as elective satisfaction of such claims payment of the following percentages of the difference between the carrier's applicable and effective tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid: (1) 20 percent for shipment of 10,000 lbs.; or less; (2) 15 percent for shipment over 10,000 lbs.; and (3) five percent where the payor is a public warehouse. Provides that claims against persons from whom the additional applicable tariff rate is sought shall not be liable for the difference between the motor carrier's rate and the rate originally billed and paid if: (1) such person is a small business or charitable organization; or (2) the transported cargo is recyclable material. Makes it an unreasonable and unlawful practice to charge the difference between the applicable filed rate and any rate for a transportation service negotiated before September 30, 1990, if the charging carrier or freight forwarder is no longer transporting property between certain places or is transporting property between such places in order to avoid application of this provision. Grants the ICC jurisdiction to determine the unreasonable practice. Denies use of the negotiated rate dispute resolution procedure to any person seeking an administrative enforcement by the ICC. (Sec. 3) Shortens the statute of limitations for the filing of claims: (1) by a motor common carrier or freight forwarder for recovery of transportation or service charges; and (2) by any person to recover overcharges by a motor carrier. (Sec. 4) Permits motor carrier's and shippers to resolve by mutual consent, subject to ICC review and approval, any overcharge and undercharge claims resulting from billing errors or incorrect tariff provisions arising from the inadvertent failure to properly and timely file and maintain agreed upon rates, rules, or classifications. (Sec. 5) Prohibits a tariff filed with the ICC from being held invalid solely on the basis that it: (1) uses a numerical or alpha account code to designate customers or describe the applicability of rates; or (2) does not show a specific rate or discount for a specific shipment if it is based on a range of rates or discounts for specific classes of shipments. (Sec. 6) Requires a motor contract carrier to enter into a written agreement (separate from a bill of lading or receipt) for the provision of transportation services. Sets forth both civil and criminal penalties for violations of this requirement. (Sec. 7) Requires the ICC to issue regulations prohibiting any motor carrier from reducing a rate set forth in its tariff or contract for any person but the one paying for the transportation service. Requires motor carriers to disclose actual rates, charges, or allowances for such transportation service. Prohibits persons from causing a motor carrier to present false or misleading information with respect to such rates, charges, or allowances. Sets forth civil penalties for knowingly paying, accepting, or soliciting reduced rates in violation of regulations. (Sec. 8) Grants the ICC jurisdiction to resolve disputes arising with respect to certain motor carriers as to whether transportation is provided as a motor common carrier or as a motor contract carrier. Declares that nothing in this Act shall be construed as limiting U.S. bankruptcy laws, including the jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts, or the applicability of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, with respect to bankrupt carriers.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Mineta, Norman Y. [D-CA-15] · D–CA

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
232 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Laid on the table. See S. 412 for further action.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 292 - 116 (Roll No. 566).

    House roll call 566 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 292 - 116 (Roll No. 566).

    House roll call 566 · Individual votes
  5. Considered as unfinished business. (CR H9657-9658)

  6. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Lipinski objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  7. DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent request made by Mr. Mineta, the House proceeded with one hour of debate.

  8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9593-9604)

  9. Mr. Rahall moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 195.

  11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Public Works + Transportation. H. Rept. 103-359.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Public Works + Transportation. H. Rept. 103-359.

  13. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  15. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).

  16. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  18. Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.

  19. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1256)

  20. Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  21. Introduced in House

  22. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2121 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2121 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2121 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2121 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources